The High Court dismissed Writ Petition No.9200 of 2015 (and IA No.2 of 2015) as infructuous because the primary respondent was promoted by the Administrative Tribunal order challenged in the writ, rendering the relief sought obsolete. No costs awarded.
Dismissal of the Writ Petition without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3413 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF NOVETVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETW
WRIT PETITION NO: 9200 OF 2015
Between:
(CT of petitioner No.4 is amended as per Court Orderdated 30-3-2015)
.....PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS IN O.A.NO,200612014
AND
....RESPONDENT/APPLICANT IN O.A.NO.200612014
....RESPONDENT--_
Petition Under Article 226 of thb Con stitution of ndia pra ng e
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari and to call for records related to order of Hon'ble Andhra
Pradesh Administrative Tribunal,Hyderabad OA.No.2006/2014 andquash or set asidethe same.
dated-21 .11.2O14in
l.A.NO:2 OF 2015(WPM P.NO:12124OF 2015)
Petition Under Sectron 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed in supportof the petition, the High Court maybe pleasedto suspend the operation of theorderdated 21 .11.2014passed in oA No.2006/2014 on the file of the Hon'bleAP Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad pending disposal of the writpetrtlon.
Counsel for the Petitioners: GPFOR SERVICES- I
Counsel for the Respondents: --
The Court made the following ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICEABHINAND KUMARSHAVILI AND
THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
WRIT PETITION No.92OO of 2015
ORDER:(Per tlte Hon'bleSn Jristtce Abhinancl KumarShauili)
When the matter is taken upforhearing, learned Government Pleader forServices appearing for the petitioners informed that during thependency of the Writ Petition, respondent No.1 r,r,aspromotedinpursuance of the orders passed by the Administrative Tribunal thus,rendering the Writ Petition as infructuous.
SDi- K.S REERAMAMURTHY ASSI TA T REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
TION OFFICER
SA GJP
HIGH COURT
DATED:0611112024
ORDER
WP.No.9200 of 2015
a5 t1,c,
16
a
a
Jo(J 21lit: 2t2i ;
7,,*
D€.9nr,r
DISMISSING THE W.P
AS INFRUCTUOUS WIHTOUTCOSTS.
/
r'
./
The District Collector (BCW), Nalgonda
District BC Welfare Officer, Nalgonda
The Commissioner & Director, B.C Welfare Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh
The Principal Secretary, State of Telangana (BCW) Department
K. Upender
The Hon'ble A.P. Administrative Tribunal
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
Laxmi Narayana Alishetty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
