This Writ Appeal was dismissed. The Court held that the stay on departmental proceedings against the respondent had expired, rendering the appeal meritless. The appellants were allowed to proceed with the inquiry under the charge memo.
The Writ Appeal was disposed of with liberty to the appellants to continue departmental enquiry; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3413 ]
HIGH COURTFORTHE STATEOF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY,THE FIFTH DAYOF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLESRIJUSNCELAXMINARAYANA ALISHETTY
WRIT APPEALNO:478OF 2023
Writ Appeal underclausp '1 5 of the Letters Patent preferred against the order dated3l-10-2022passedinw.p.No.z+oglof2O22onthefileoftheHighCourt-
...A''ELLANTS
AND Ch.Venuoopal,S/o. Laxmirajam,aged about -^5^3vears Occ: Deputy suoerintendentof Police (bBF;"'ru?n rtro a-+-236' Ftat No'119' Shreem e;5;;'hi;;";;\p-urtr"ntt,('tt'iurnp"'Karimnasar' Telansanastate'
...RESPONDENT
lA NO: 2 oF2023
Petition underSection 151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavitfiled in supportof the petition' the High Court maybe pleasedto suspendthe order dated31'1O '2022 passed by the Learned SingleJudge in W.P.No.2469'1of 2022, pending disposal of the Writ Appeal'
Counselfor the Appellants:GP FOR SERVICES-I
Counsel forthe Sole Respondent: SRI CH'VENKAT RAMAN
The Courtmade the following:ORDER
i I I I l
I i I I I I I i I I l
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABTIINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
WzuT APPEAL No.478 of2023
JUDGMENT (per Hon'hle Sri Justice Abhinqnd Kumqr ShrIvili)
This Writ Appeal is filed aggrieved by the order. dated 31.10.2022, passed by leamed single Judge of this Court in W.P.No.24691 o1-2022.
AKS,J&I,NA,J 2 tfA.No-478ol 2023
5 Subject to theabove observations,this Writ Appeal is
disposed of. Nocosts.
1l,.t.J&L_..!,J Ll'.,1 \n,178 o12023
J
i
6 As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall
stand closed.
SD/. B. SATYAVATHI DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUECOPY// t", SECTTONOFFICER
6 One CCto SF.l CHVENKATRATUAN' AdvocateIOPUC,] 7 Two CD CoPit:s '9 k BSR t" GJP
HIGH COURT
DATED: 05111t2024
JUDGMENT
B lHt s ih, ( s <br>,<br>o
3 0 0[C rrr{ i,
c
* !)6Sp
WA.No.478 of 2023
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT APPEAT
WITHOUT COSTS n"
sp--
\9 Vt-,,Y \o csxi&)-
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the Writ Appeal should succeed given that the stay on departmental proceedings has expired
Whether the High Court should interfere with the order staying departmental enquiry against the respondent
What order should be passed regarding the pending departmental charges against the respondent
State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary, BKRB Bhavan, Hyderabad
Ch. Venuopal, S/o Laxmirajam, Deputy Superintendent of Police
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
Laxminarayana Alishetty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
