A writ petition under Article 226 and Section 151 CPC regarding mutation of agricultural land was dismissed after the petitioner sought and obtained permission to withdraw the petition.
Permission to withdraw the petition was accorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32e61
tI
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER- -*'' TWOTHOUSANDAND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 8568 oF 2023
Between:
Smt. Gunti Lavanva. W/o mo v"[,), iT,LirlitnJl!";"l1iJi3'"11[*3,s#,.3,"yfij1i.,p,.T asricurture,
...PETITIONER
AND
a The District Co ector, Rajanna Sircilla District at Sircilla ... 3 Divr sional Officer, Vemutawada Division, Rajanna Sircilla |[:r[i*"r"
o- Bodapatla Renuka. Wlo pra Rv; r\r ; il" i; viil s "'6'n";,ij,llf; i il, }J#i'$,::fl # Jf3,li; Bec as ric u rtu re,
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Articte 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ' order or Direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ of Mandamus. decraring the action of the respondents particurarry respondents 2 ro 4 in not considering the representation dated 03.03.2023 of the petitioner requesting to derete the name of the unofficiar respondents 5 and 6 from online revenue records incruding dharani portar iregalry mutated their names in connection with the petitioner agricurturar rand to an extent of Ac.1.27 gts in Sy No. 589 situated at ll,4aryara viflage, chandurthi Mandar, Rajanna sircila District is
f
I I it i
illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and also violative of Articles 14, 19,21 and 300-4 of constitution of lndia and consequenfly direct the respondents 2lo 4lo mutate the petitioner name and agrl lands into online revenue records incruding dharani by issuing the fresh ppBs and rrDs by removing the names of the unofficiar respondents 5 and 6 by considering the representation dated 03.03.2023 0f the petitioner in the interest of justice.
IANO:1O F 2023
Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired ir support of the petition, the High courr may be preased to direct the respondents 2 to 4 to issue onrine ppBs and rrDs in connection with the petitioners agrr rands to an extent of Acj .27 gts in sy No. 589 situated at Maryara Village, chandurthi Mandat, Rajanna sircila District by dereting the nambs of the unofficiar respondents 5 and 6 from the onrine reveriue records by considering the representation datr:d 03.03.2023 0f the petitioner. pending disposar of the main writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI pENUBALL| RAMESH BABU
Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 to 4: Gp FOR REVENUE
Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.5 and 6: SRI y. BALA MURALI
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION N0.8558 0F 2023
ORDER:
I J I j
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the petition. 2. Permission as sought for is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrairn There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, il anv pending in this writ peti shall stand dismissed SD/. P. PADMANABH DY ASSTSTANT REGIpTRAR //TRUE COPY' It \ SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to SriPenuballi RameshBabu' Advocate [OPUQ i. iwo CCs to GPfor Revenue, High Court for the Stateof Telangana'at Hvderabad [OUTI 3. Ohe CC to Sri Y. Balal,4urali.Advocate[OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies TJ GJP f0'
HIGH COURT
DATED:1711212024
ORDER
WP.No.8568 of 2023
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS o" It/L --+- t3la(ui t ^ 7i</sup>
Smt. Gunti Lavanva
State of Telangana
C.V. Bhaskar Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
