Writ petition challenging proposed deduction of permit fee under G.O. Ms. No. 21 Industries and Commerce (Mines) from bills under three work agreements was withdrawn by petitioners and dismissed as withdrawn, with interim order vacated and no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3252]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
WRIT PETITIO N NO: 8408 OF 2024
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ. order or direction, declaring the action of respondents in contemplating to deduct permit Fee stipulated under G.o. Ms. No.21 lndustries and commerce (rvines.l) Department Dt.3110312022 from the bills payable to the petitioner in relation to the
works being executed by the petitioner side Agreement Nos. (1) 575t2023-2024 (2) 57612023'2024 and (3) 57712023-2024 ar Dt. 0611212023 executed between the Petitioner No.1 and the Respondent No. 4 as iregar, arbitrary and contrary to the terms and conditions of the respective agreements and further direct the respondents not to deduct any amounts tifled as permit Fee vide G.o. Ms. No. 2l lndustries and commerce (Mines.r) Department Dr. 3110312022 from the biils payable to the petitioner No.'1 by the Respondents under the respective agreements (1) 57sr2023'2024 (2) sr6r2o23-2024 and (3) sr7r2o23-2o24 ar Dt. 06t12-12023.
IANO: 1O F 2024
Petition under Section 151 CpC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to grant interim directions restraining the Respondents from making any deductions towards purported permit fee from running birs arising out of execution of work pursuant to the agreements Nos. (1) 575/2023-2024 (2) 57612023-2024 and (3) 57712023-2024 a' Dt. 06/ 1212023 between the petitioner No l and the Respondent No. 4 pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the petitioners: SRI S. CHAKRAPANI
counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 6; Gp FoR socrAl WELFARE counsel forthe Respondent No.7: cp FoR FTNANCE AND PLANNTNG The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
WRIT PETITION No.84O8 OF 2O24
ORDER:
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of thepetitioners seekspermission of this Court for withdrawal of thepresent writ petition.
withdrawn. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any,pending in thisWrit
Petition , shall stand clesed.
SD/. A. SRINIVASA DDY ASSISTANTREGI TRAR
\
//TRUE COPYi/
\
SECTIONOFICER
To, 'l . One CC to Sri S- Chakrapani, Advocate [OPUC] . 2. Two CCs toGPfor sociiiivetfari,HGri co''r fcjr the State of Telangana' at 3 i,ffi"bC;il'iriu Hvderabad [OUT]bp for Finance and Planning'High courtfor the State of - Telangana, at HYderabad[OPUC] 4. Two CD CoPies TJ GJP
HIGH COURT
DATED:1211112024
ORDER
WP.No.8408 of 2024
1 yl S IA i C
(
I
cc 10 [E[ 2ri2{
c,
t
F3;>416vrr
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS.
3
1A ,r-t
I
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s Sri Sai Constructions (Firm No 77 of 1998), rep. by its Managing Partner Sri Chitturi Bapineedu
Chitturi Bapineedu
The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department
The Chief Engineer, Tribal Welfare Department, Hyderabad
Director of Works Accounts, Telangana
Superintending Engineer, Tribal Welfare Department, Circle Warangal
Surepalli Nanda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
