Writ petition challenging a Wakf Board Memo; counsel for petitioner submitted the cause no longer survived, and the High Court dismissed the petition as infructuous without costs, closing pending miscellaneous applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3300 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF I/IARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION NO:8070 0F 2011
Between:
lvlanaging.. Committee Dargah Hazrath Data Guni Baksh (RH) situated at Nirmal Adilabad Disrricr nep..py its Generat SeiierZiy, n/rl r'rh. Wlietri, 9{qu. M.A.Hateem,ageri+5'years, oi., l"iii,irGi, ny". H.li".ij:iIiJ, ord Bus Srand, Nirmat, Ao'itaoao diitrici, A.F-.--- "-""
...PETITIONER
AND
A.P. state wakf Board, Reg. b.y its chief Executive officer, office at Razzaq Manzil, Haj House, Nampaily, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENT
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High'c;u.t ,ry L" pleased to issue a writ or writs more appropriatery a writ of mandamus declaring the impugned Memo bearing F.No.' 7/AdB/rvzoor-supfiy oateo 04-12-2010 issued by the respondent is illegal, void and ultra vires in ine interest ofjustice and equity.
l.A. NO: 1OF 2011(WPMP . NO: 10022 0F 20111
Petition under Section 15'l cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, irre High court may be pleased io suspend the operation of the Memo F.No. 7/ADB/K2001-suppiy daied 04-122010 issued by the respondent till the disposat of the writ petitio; in the interest ofjustice and equity.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRt A.M. eURESHI
Counsel for the Respondents: MIR MASOOD KHAN, SC FOR WAQF BOARD
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRT JUSTICE NAGESHBHEIMAPAKA UTRIT PETITION No.8O7O of 2OLL
ORDER:
When the matter is taken upforhearing, learned counsel for petitionersubmitsthat the cause in the writ petition does not surrrive for adjudication.
2 Recording the said submission, this writpetition 1S dismissed as infructuous. No orderas to costs.
Miscellaneous applications, pending if any,shall stand
closed
//TRUE COPY//
SDI.V.KAVITHA ASSISTAN REGISTRAR SEC ON OFFICER
To, 1. One CC to SRIA.lVl. QURESHI,Advocate [OPUC] , i. d; ca i; sRi urduAsoookunru, sc FoRWAoFBoARD [oPUc] 3. Two CD Copies
BN SB
! l
HIGH COURT
DATED:01 !0312024
ORDER
WP.No.8070 of 2011
1 H E S TA 16'
o
oJ
0 6 APB 20A
)az
t
* DF PATcHgO
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
be 0 GQrr'z%"
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Managing Committee Dargah Hazrath Data Guni Baksh (RH), Nirmal, Adilabad District
A.P. State Wakf Board
Nagesh Bheemapaka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
