High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a lottery-based allotment of house sites to junior officers, finding the plea infructuous as no allotment took place. Quashable petition closed without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
I
[3300 ]
HIGH COURTFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE FIRSTDAYOF MARCH TWO THOUSANDANDTWEruTYTOUR
PRESENT
TI-iE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITIONNO:1291 6 0F 2010
Between:
.....PETITIONERS
AND
.I
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiledtherewith, theHigh Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order, direction moreparticularly onein the nature of writ of mandamus declaringthat the actionof the respondentsNo.5 and 6 in conducting theballot lotterysystemon 7 4.2O1O, vide circular for allotment of house siteto juniors representativeof the seniority criteria without following the G.o.Ms.No.633ClauseNo 2(r)a(i), 5, dated17.11 .1992 are illegal, contrary to law,violative of principles of naturaljustice and liable to be set aside and consequentlyto directthe respondent No.4, 5 and 6, to allotthe house site basing on senioritycriteriaas per G.Otvls No.633General dated17.11.1992.
l.A.NO:1 OF 2010 WPMP.NO:16266 OF 2010
Petition UnderSection 151 CPCprayrngthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavitfiled in supportof the petition.the High court may be pleased to stay all furtherproceedingsin respectof the lotteryallotmentto the junior members irrespectiveof seniority of the menrbersfor allotment of house sites on 7.4.2010, vide circularwithout following the G O'Ms'No 633' Clause No'2(1)'4 and5datedlT.ll.lgg2,byViolatingthehousesite,pendingdisposalofthewrit petition.
Counsel for thePetitioners: SRI MD MUJEEBULLAH SHAREEF
Counsel for theRespondentNos-l to 3 : GP FORSERVICES- I
CounselfortheRespondentNos.4to6:SRIR'N'HEMENDRANATHREDDY
The Court made thefollowing ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICENAGESHBHEEMAPAI{A CfRIT PETITION No .L29L6 of2O10
ORDER:
When the matter is taken upfor hearing, learned counsel forrespondentNo.6 submits that the causein
the writ petition doesnot survive for adjudication.
2 Recording the said submission,this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.No order as to costs.
Miscellaneous applications,pending ifany, shallstand closed (
LAHANSARI sD,-MoTiSA+tHY REGI STRAR
I/TRUECOPY/'
SECTIONOFFICER
;q1{Etliit',il#;t*-''rreaneanaa'i
SA
KKS k
II
HIGH COURT
DATED:01 10312024
ORDER
WP.No.12916 of 2010
tt\ E gT,Ar
(
3
oo 0 ;;I ffi-l
7.
I it :r r,'r r;i+1ii
DISMISSING THE W.P,
AS INFRUCTUOUS,WITHOUT COSTS.
{/n!
c
T. Maboo Basha and others
The President, Andhra Pradesh Non-Gazetted Officers (Gachi Bowli) Mutually Aided Co-operative Housing Society Ltd.
The Secretary, Andhra Pradesh Non-Gazetted Officers (Gachi Bowli) Mutually Aided Co-operative Housing Society Ltd.
Nagesh Bheemapa
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
