"...to issue a Writ or order or Direction in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring ttre action of the 2nd Respondent in Proceedings No. HM/DI/ZV/ZVlSTNU/0848, Dated 30.72.2o2r Realigned to local cadre Zore V, Yadadri a-nd erstwhile local cadre/Present working place is Zone-Yl, Koti at Hyderabad and the 3.d Respondent issuing proceedings I{J|II/DIZV /S'[NU/OO8, Dated 70.O1.2022 violating G. O. Ms. No. 3 1 7 dated 06. 12.2O2I, without scrutinizing the preferences subrnitted by the employees ald without following the seniority as a result Juniors were retained in YI Zone ald Seniors were allocated Realigned Zones and the 2nd Respondent is not having aly Jurisdiction or power to re-aligned t1 e new local cadre Zone V to the petitioner as per the G.O.Ms.No. 124, Dated 30.08.2018 since the presential order came into force 30.08.2018 arrd which was lapsed on 30.OA.2O2| and respondent issued proceedings after lapse of 4 months i.e. 30 -12.2021 reallocating tJle petiLioner to Zone V which is contra4r to the G.O.Ms.No.124, Rule 3 issued by the State Government and Service Rules as arbitrary, illegal, unjust and procedurally substantially ultra-vires and the sarne is violative of Fundarnental Rights guaranteed under Article 14, 16 a-nd 2l and procedure for amendment of the Constilution under Article 368 and Class 1O of Articie 371 (D) of the Constitution of India and consequently quash tJ:e proceedings of 2nd Respondent in issuing Proceedings No. Proc. No.HM/DIlZu /Zv /STNU /0848, Dated 30.t2.2O2t and 3'd Respondent issuing proceedings Hl|l{/DI7'| /STNU/OO8, Dated 1O.O1.2O22 and direct the respondents to issue reallocation orders to the pelitioner'n Y7 Zone and pass..."
