G. Shankar v. Smt. M. Esther Prabhulatha, B. E. (Mech)
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court closed a contempt case finding no willful disobedience as respondents complied with the interim order by issuing proceedings within the time period.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed. No penalty. Petitioner may approach the court with leave to challenge the rejection order.
What the court decided
[3255 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 699 OF 2024
Contempt Case filed under Sections 10 &12 ofContemptof CourtsAct, 1971 to punish the Respondent herein for willfully, deliberatelyviolating Orders of the High Court in W.P. No. 21585 of 2000 dated20-11-2010,W.P. No.25103 dated 30-08-20'12 and W.P. No. 8797 ol 2017dated'10'02-2023.
Between:
G Shankar, S/o. Lakshmaiah, Aged 53, Occ. Shramik,TSRTC, Sangareddy Depot, Sangareddy (Post, Mandal and Dist ), 502001
...Petitioner
AND
Smt M Esther Prabhulatha, B. E.(Mech), the RegionalManager,( 3rd Respondent ) T.S.R.T.C. Sanga Reddy Region, ThrinethraComplex, 2nd floor, (Post) Sangareddy - 502001
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
G Shankar
- respondent
Smt M Esther Prabhulatha
- respondent
T.S.R.T.C.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/699/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court