Disposed

Shabana. Nikhath v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC23 Dec 2024WP/36018/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition filed for appointment in left-over DSC-2008 vacancies. At hearing, counsel confined arguments to stay of disposal regarding pending representations. Court disposed of petition by directing respondents to act on representations. No merits adjudicated.

What did the court decide?

Directed Respondents 2 & 3 to pass appropriate orders on representations dated 11.12.2024 and 02.12.2024 expeditiously, within 4 weeks, communicating copy to petitioner.

Shabana. Nikhath Vs The State of Telangana — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

[3301 I

¶2

IN THE HIGH^{COURT FOR THE STATE OF.TE.LANGANAAT HYDERABAD} (SPecial Original^{Jurisdiction)}

¶3

MONDAY,^{THE TWENTYTHIRD DAY OF DECEMBER} TWO^{THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR}

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICEPULLA KARTHIK}

¶6

WRIT^{PETITION NO:36 018 0F 2024}

¶7

Between:

¶8

Shabana. Nikhath,^{D/o Khaja'shareef'Aged.about 48 vears' Occ'Un-employee} (BC-E). F/o H.No.B-9-1?#: i;ft;^{Fo'i rni"um'KhammamDistrict-50700'} ir, t t.riCret No.222oo2oooo25

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

i8:?"',.'fi i%:l'r"1ffi E?,x:flffi 3Fi.?{"lisEl[",'3fir'fiff:?l,o:%

¶12

The Director^{of schoolEducation' Stateof Telangana'Hyderabad'}

¶13

The District^{EducationalOfficer'Khammam Khammam District'}

¶14

The District^{Collector and Chairman' DSC-2008' Khammam'Khammarn Dist'}

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

PetitionunderArticle226oftheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstances^{stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be} pleased to issue a^{writ Petitionorder or direction more particularlyone in the} natureWritofMandamus,declaringthatthepetitionerisentitiledforselectionand appointment^{to the post of S'G'Teacher(Urdu Medium) in the ]eft overunfilled} vacanciesinDsC-200Bwithallconsequentialbenefitsbyholdingtheactionofthe respondents^{in not consideringthe iust claim of the petitioner for appointment to} thepostofS'G.Teacher(UrduMedium)intheunfilledvacanciesofDSc-2008 eventhoughseveralofpersonswho.werecalledforcertiflcatesverificationhave not attended^{is as illegal,arbitrary'unjust and violativeof Arricles14'16and 21 of} the Constitution^{of lndia.}

¶17

1A NO: 1 OF 2024

¶18

Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents to pass appropriate orders on the representation of the petitioner dated 11-12-2024 and 02-12-2024, pending disposal of the main Writ petition.

¶19

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI RAMU NALLAMOTHU

¶20

Counsel for the Respondents: Gp FOR SERVICES t

¶21

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶22

THE HON'BLE^{SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK}

¶23

WRIT PETITIO^{N No.36o18of2024}

¶24

ORDER:

¶25

This Writ^{Petition,under Article 226 of ttre Constitutionof India'is}

¶26

frled seeking^{the followingrelief}

¶27

"...to issue^{a writ Petition order or direction moreparticularly one in} the nature^{of Writ of Uurra^rn'"' itchring that thepeti. tioneris entitled} for selection^{and appointmentillnt f'"t-is'.q tt'1t*} !Ytd"^Medium)in the left^{over unfiled vacancie"i" bsizooAwith all consequentia'l beneirts} beholding^{the action of the} "tpottat"tt tt'" po"t^{i" of not S considering-the G'Teacher(Urdu Medium) just claim inof} the oetitioner lil: ',;?;iJ;;;;"ii'""^{forapPointment i" osc'iooe !u"" tt'o'gt'severalor persons who} "l' were called^{forcertifrcates -t'"tintttlot'have not} -^{attended isas} illesal.arbitrary,unjust^and "itf"t-f*- 'i^{Articles14' 16 and 21 of the} coisitution^{of India and} Pass^'"

¶28

Though^{the Writ Petition is filedseekingthe aforesaid relief' at the} time of hearing,^{Sri N' Ramu, Iearned counsel appearingfor the pelitioner'I} confined^{his arguments to the extentof consideration of the representations /} of the^{petitioner dated ll'12'2024a'..d 02'12'2024'and prayed this Court} to direct^{respondentNos.2 and 3 respectively to passnecessar5rorders} within a reasonable^{periodof time'}

¶29

l,earned^{Government Pleader for Services-Ifairly submits that} respondent^{Nos.2and 3 will consider the representations of the petitioner} dated^{11.12.2O24 and 02'12'2024'respectively'and pass appropriate} orders in^{acrordarcewit]l law'}

¶30

¶31

PK, J W.P.No.36018 of 2024

¶32

Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the respective parties, without going into merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of directing respondent Nos-2 and 3 to pass appropriate orders on the representations of the petitioner dated 11.12.2 O24 and 02.12.2024 respectively' strictly in accordarrce with law, as expeditiousry as possible, preferably within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. and communicate a copy thereol.to the petitioner.

¶33

Miscelaneous apprications, if ary, pending in this wri1. petition, shail stald closed. No costs.

¶34

't SD/.S. MALLIKARJUNA ASSIS^{TANT REGIS} RAR

¶35

//TRUE COPY//

¶36

<sup>To, 1 The Princioal Secretary^{to Government, School EducationDepartment' State} ' of ielangdna, Secretaiiat, Hyderabad'

¶37

The Director^{of school Education, Stateof Telangana'Hyderabad'}

¶38

The^{District EducationalOfficer, Khammam'Khammam District'}

¶39

The District^{Collector and Chairman,DSC-2008' Khammam'Khammam Dist'}

¶40

One CC to^{SRI RAMU NALLAMOTHU,Advocate'[OPUC]}

¶41

Two CCs to^{GP FOR SERVICES l, High Court for the Stateof Telangana'} tourl

¶42

7- Two CD CoPies.

BSK

t I

HIGH COURT

DATED:2311212024

CC TODAY

1 I
G
C.\ 1..,
(,tav .ts t
,\ ac
F
{-, O
o oi'
*
J FI c

¶50

ORDER

¶51

WP.No.36018 of 2024

¶52

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WTHOUT COSTS

¶53

,:l*1 @

Shabana. Nikhath v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shabana. Nikhath v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gopalabhotla Naga Malleswari Vs The State of Telangana

The Management of Deccan College of Medical Sciences Princess Esra Hospital Vs The Labour Court-Iii

T Yakaiah 57 others Vs The State of Telangana

M.Laxmi Narayana Vs The Managing Director

V. Sujatha Vs State of Telangana

V. Nagarjuna Vs The State of Telangana