In a consent disposal, the High Court directed Respondent No. 2 to expeditiously consider the petitioner's representation dated 11.11.2024 for regularizing his suspension period and pass orders in accordance with law within six weeks.
Directed Respondent No. 2 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 11.11.2024 and pass orders within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3301 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
WRIT PETITION NO: 35956 0F 2024
Between
)fNagarjuna, S/o. Yakaiah, Aged about 38 years,OccSupervisor, AMC, Kodakandla, Presentiy at Bhainsa, Ryo. H.No.i 1-91/3, Nag'arjuna bolony., Thorrur, ftrlahabubabad, District-506 1 63.
...PET|T|ONER AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ol rhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of lrrlandamus by declaring the action of Respondent in not regularizing the suspension period as on duty with all benefits as wholly illegal, arbitrarily, u nconstitutional violative of statutory rules and also violative of Article 14,'16 and 21 of constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondents.to regularize the suspension period forthwith and pay the entire arrears of salary, increments and all other service benefits with interest at the rate of 12yo.
IA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to consider my representation on dated'1 1-1 1-2024 and consequenfly direcl the
respondents to regularizethe suspensionperiod forthwith pending disposal of the main writ petition-
Counsel for thePetitioner:SRIAVADESH NARAYAN SANGHI Counsel for theRespondent Nos.1 & 2: GP FOR SERVICES-|| Counsel for the RespondentNos.3 & 4: SRI N.UMA SHANKAR. SC FOR AMC
The Court made thefollowing:ORDER
J
lt
: --.7
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITION No.35956 0F 2024
ORDER:
With the consent of both the parties, this Writ petition is ta-ken up disposal, at the admission stage.
"'_ 10 is:u: approprktte LUnt o,rder.or. dueclion more partictlarlg otrc tn tt@
nature of Writ of Mand.amus.by dectdring ,i ""iA".if respondent tn not regularizing the susperLsion.pciod as on dutg with all benifits os u,ttoltl iuegal, arbitrarita, unconstitutional. . aou,u" o1- iiio* ),2i"'j-io atso uiotatiue of Article t 4, t6 & 2 t ot Constitution'.i t"aii ""^i* *frLqr.nuo dtect the
responden-ts to regutaiie !!. ""1e1.i"i, i"i.a lrinii."nd. pay the entire arrears of sarary, increments ana'ar otnei seruicl-ii{.ro'"n ttterest at the rcrte of 1 20,6 dnd pdss. _ . "
-!
2
PK, J W.P.No.35956 of 2024
the petitioner sought permission of this Court to make a representation redressing his grievance. Consequenfly, the said Writ Petition was disposed of on OI.OZ .2024. pursuant to same, the petitioner has submitted representation, dated Lt.ll.2024, seeking regularization of his su spension period and the same is pending consideration. Therefore, learned counsel prays this Court to direct respondent No.2 to consider the representation, dated ll.ll.2)24, submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders thereon, within a reasonable period of time.
PK, J w.P.No.35956 of 2024
.,7
J
from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicatea
copy thereof to the petitioner. There shall beno orderas to costs.
.Miscellaneousappiications,if any, pending in this Writ Petition,
shall stand closed.
SD/. K.SREERAMAMU RTHY ASSISTANTREGIS
/
/iTRUECOPY'
SECTION FFICER
\
To 1 - The PrincipleSecretary, Agriculture and Cooperative' Secretariat'Saifabad ' Hvderabad,State of Telanoana 2. C6mmissioneranOO,reJioYlii'tarteting Government of Telangana'
r.F}*x.',ssl"i-ff#iltlExi[.;$:ffifl.**ffii","','l':,"",
, attftl,Etl,lo 'HAKAR' sc FoRAMC roPUCl 8. TwoCD CoPies PSK.
GJP 6
l
HIGH COURT
DATED:2311212024
ORDER
WP.No.35956 of 2024
1H
3 0 0EC Zrlz4
oot C
t i n
P.r,.7C\ EL]
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS $*ttW
!
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should direct the State to consider the petitioner's representation regarding regularization of his suspension period within a reasonable timeframe.
Nagarjuna, S/o. Yakaiah
The State of Telangana
Commissioner and Director of Marketing Government
Agriculture Market Committee, Kodakandla
Agriculture Market Committee, Palakurthi
Pulla Karthik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
