A writ petition challenging the allocation of acquired land was dismissed as infructuous because the petitioner admitted the cause no longer survived, rendering the petition useless. No costs were awarded.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
\
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 32465 OF 2014
Between:
SRB Housing Developers Private Limited, A company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, having its registered office at 6-3-570, FIatNo.501 , Diamond Block, Lumbini Rockdale Compound, Beside EenaduBuildings, Somajiguda, Hyderabad, represented by its tVlanaging Director, Sri S.Ramesh Babu S/o late Lingaiah, aged about 48years, Occ Business,Rl/o. Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
...TTESPONDENTS
Petition uncler Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying.that in the circumstances stated rn the affidavit filed therewith, the High'court may oe pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or Direction, particllarly, one in the nature of writ of I.4andamus, directing transfer of Reviiion petition Nos.Dl/6087/2014, D1121o3t2014, D1t21ost20'r4 and E1t33g2t2o' 0, from the first respondent Joint collector-ll to the Joint collector-l or the District c:ollector, Ranga Reddy District.
l.A. NO: 1OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 40575 OF 20141
Petition undr:r Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the orders passed by the second respondent Revenue Divisional officer, in case No.cl273itl2oo7 and c1273412007 dated 17 11.2oo} and ail further and consequential proc,ec'dings and letters, pending disposal of the main writ petition.
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 40580 OF 20141
Petition underr section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstirnces stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in all the revision petitions bearing Nos D1/60g7/2014, D'll2'1O312O14, D112105t2014 and E1t3392t20.10, on the fite of the First Respondent pending disposal of the main writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. SRINIVAS VELAGAPUDI
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 to 16: --
The Court made the following: ORDER
1
THE HON'BLE SRI WSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.32465 OF 2014
ORDER:
Toda]r when the matter is taken up for hearing the learned Counsel for petitioner would submit that thc causc in the present Writ Petition does not siurvive and therebrz the Writ Petition has become infruc'-uous.
Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs
,1. As secluei to it, Miscellaneous Petitions pencling, if
any, shall stand closed.
siD/- K. MAJI ASSISTANIT REGI TRAR
//TRUE COPY//
To,
SECTION OFFICER
3 Two CD Copies KKS GJP Yk
HIGH COURT
\
DATED:1711212024
\ r{E 9rAI €
c t
6l
co 2 B tEB 2[25
'+* *
_ ra.lj r;aT c"'
ORDER
WP.No.32465 of 2014
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
Gr& &,
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the present Writ Petition survives given that the cause for it has disappeared.
Whether the Writ Petition should be maintained or dismissed as infructuous.
SRB Housing Developers Private Limited
Government of Telangana
K. SARATH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
