The court recorded the petitioner's counsel's submission that the writ petition no longer survives and has become infructuous. The court accepted this submission and dismissed the writ petition as infructuous without costs, also dismissing pending miscellaneous petitions.
Dismissed as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
IN THE HIGHCOURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THETWELFTHDAY OF SEPTETUBER TWO THOUSANDAND TW'ENTYFOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO:33 o44 oF 2018
Between:
Years, Mandadi PJoH.No-3-194'Laxmi Narasim ha 6nr'Xiri;#-virrage,Bhongiri Reddv, S/OLate Ramchandra Mandal Reddy' - Yadadri'BhonsiriAged. About54 Dist,Telanga n a-508116
...PETITIONER
AND
Petition underArticle 226 of the Constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court maybe pleased to issue anappropriate writor order or direction more particularly onein thenatureofWritoflvlandamusdeclaringtheinactionofthelstrespondentin disposingthe stay applicationfiled along with Appeal RC No 9133/2017IPALS' DatedBthofDecember2olTandaSillegalandunconstitutionalandconsequently suspendproceedingsdated 25- 02-2016' 19-12-2016and O2-O2-2O17vide' Rc.No.2512017-Y-BCtilldisposaloftheappealbefore'lstrespondent RC.No.9133/2017IPALS.Dated8th of December2017'
lA NO: 1 oF 2018
Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend proceedings dated 25-02-2016,1g-12-2016 and 02-02-2017 vide Rc No 2512017-y-BC ti, the 1st respondent herein disposes of the appear RC.No.9133/2017lpALS. Dated 8th of December 2017.
Counsel for the petitioner : SRI S.N.VEERENDER SINGH
Counsel for the Respondents: Gp FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLESRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
WRIT PETITION No. 330,44of 2018
ORDER:
Learned Counselfor the petitioner submitsthat the
cause inthe writ petition does not survive and the writ
petition hasbecome infructuous'
Recordingthe said submission'the Writ Petition is
dismissedas infructuous '
MiscellaneousPetitions,ifalypendinginthiswrit
petition, shallstald dismissed' No orderas to costs'
SD/- N. CHANDRASEKHAR RAO ASSISTAN REGISTRAR
II
//TRUE COPY/i
\
TION OFFICER
W
HIGH COURT
DATED:12 t09t2024
ORDER
IH6 S i'4
( o
o 0 0 JAIJ 2025 tr('I,
o p
(1"1-r;-,tf:t1 *
WP.No.33044 of 2018
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
6 (9 lb
)y
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives or has become infructuous?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Laxmi Narasimha Yadadri Bhonsiri Reddy
The Commissioner and Registrar Co-operative societies Nampally Hyderabad Telangana
The District Co-operative officer Yadadri Bhuvanagiri Telangana
The President Primary agriculture Co-op Credit Society Ltd Chandupatla
Chief Executive Officer (secretary) Primary agriculture Co-op Credit Society Ltd, ChanduPatla
The State of Telangana Co-operative Department Rep. by its Secretary Secretariat Hyderabad Telangana
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
