The petitioner withdrew the writ petition on the ground that the cause had become infructuous. The Court dismissed the petition as infructuous and closed the pending miscellaneous petitions without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 18750 OF 2019
Between:
Smt. P. Jyothi, Wo. Pottala Babu, Aged 38 years, Occ. House wife MPTC (lNC), MPP, Waddeman-ll Bijinepalli-Mandal, Nagarkaronool-District 509203, Telangana
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndiaprayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, theHigh Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, moreparticularly onein the nature of writ of .mandamus under Article 226 of Constitutionof lndia or any other writ declaring the impugned orderpassed by the 3rdrespondent vide proceedings No.Ele.MPTC-ZPf Cl2019 dt.16/08/20'19 as being arbitrary,illegal, unconstitutional and being withoutjurisdiction and clearviolation of the Rule-11, Sub-Rule-Sand Rule 22, Sub-Rule-S of the Telangana PanchayathRaj (Conductof Election of Member (Co-Opted,president and Vice-Presidentof Mandal Praja Parishad and Members (Co-Opted) Chairperson and Vice Chairpersonof Zilla Parishad) Rules
,/
2018 and consequently set aside the impugned order passed by the 3'd respondent vide proceedings No.Ele.MPTC-ZPTCI2}1g dt.16/082019 in the interest , of justice and equity.
lA NO:'l OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of operation of the impugned order passed by the 3rd respondent vide proceedings No. EIe MPTC-ZPTC|2119 dt.16t0$t1019 pending disposat of the above writ petition in the interest of justice.
lA NO:'f OF 2020
Between:
A. Ravi Kumar, S/o. A. Sriramulu Aqe. Maior, Occ. Aqriculture R/o. H. No.2280, Santa Bazar Nager Kurnool, DiJt. ruag'ar kurnoollTelangana ...PETITIONER/RESPONDETN NO.4
AND
...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
Petition under Section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to vacate lhe interim stay granted by this Honorable court on 28.08.2019 in l.A. No. 1 of 2019 in WP No.'1 8750 of 201 9 in the interest of justice.
7
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VENKAT REDDY DONTHIREDDY
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FORPANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEVELOPMENT
Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI B. NARAYANA REDOY,
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
7
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.18750 OF 2O1 9 ORDER:
Today when the matter is taken up for hearing the learned Counsel for petitioner would submit that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive and thereby the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
J As sequel to it, Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed
SD/- N. SRIHARI ASSISTANT R ISTRAR
//TRUE COPYII
SECTI FFICER
To,
TJ LS 4. Two CD Copies Vry\ f \t '
HIGH COURT
DATED:1 110912024
ORDER
WP.No.18750 of 2019
t cR THE S r4
o
). 11 DE." 2tr21 z
I
t
D4TaHt: (<br>
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS
WITHOUT COSTS. ?* >\l.))-( 1
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Smt. P. Jyothi
The State of Telangana
The District Collector
The Presiding Officer, Mandal Praja Parishad
A. Ravi Kumar
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
