Writ petition seeking mandamus to compel registration of a crime on the petitioner's complaint; petitioner failed to appear on three successive dates despite listing under caption 'for dismissal', and the writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32e6 ]
IN THE HIG COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA I AT HYDERABAD |(SpecialOriginal Jurisdiction)
I TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
uL*,r r=r,r,oN No: 318 oF 2oz3
Between:
M. Rajeshwar Rdo S/o Late Rajaiah, Aged about 69 year, Occ: Business Rl/o H.No. 37-7414, Plot No.86, Mutyal Rao Co-operative Society, J.J.Nagar, Malkajgiri Mandal Medchal-Malkajgiri district.
...PETITIONER
AND
llI I
...RESPONDENTS
II
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated iri the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAI{US declaring the action of the respondents in not registering a crime based on the complaint dated 28-12-2022, received by the 3rd respondent against the respondents 4 and 5 though the compliant disclosing the cognizable offence is illegal, arbitrary, and contrary to the provisions of 154 of Cr.P.C. and also contrary to the settled principle of law laid down by the Hon'ble Apdx Court.
IiIttt il
lA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under e ion 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated h the_affidavit filed in's0pport of the petition, the High court may be pleased to DIRECT the 3rd respohdent to register a crime against the respondenis 4 and 5 basing on the complaint of the petitioner dated 28-12-2022, forthwith pending disposal of the Writ petitfon.
Counsel for the Petitidntr: SRI P. PADMA RAO
Counsel tor tne RespJnlent ruo.t to 3: ASST. cp FOR HOME Counset for the Respdnl"nt trto.+ & 5: - - - -
The court."a" tr" Jltl*ing: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.318 of 2023
ORDER:
When the matter was called on 11.12.2023, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed on 23.0-1..2024. On 23.01.2024 also, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, this Court directed to list the matter on 06.02.2024 under tl-re caption 'for dismissal'. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, though the matter is listed under the caption 'for dismissal'. This indicates that the petitioner herein has no interest in prosecuting the present case.
There shall be no order as to costs
Petition shall stand closed
SD/. C. PRAVEENKUMAR ASSISTANTREGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//
SEC OFFICER
To,
I ,
HIGH COURT
DATED:0610212 24
R 1 H E s TA 14:
o
$(
oc
0 7 t4An 2024
az
D
AT HEO
ORDER
WP.No.318 of 2 23
DISMISSING TH WRIT PETITION FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS @orys €- s)
3 provisions across 3 enactments
M. Rajeshwar Reddy
The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department
The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad
The Station House Officer, Alwal P.S.
C. Papi Reddy
C. Hima Deepthi
C.V. Bhaskar Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
