The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the inaction of the Grampanchayat in granting construction permission as infructuous, noting that no further orders were necessary and the cause did not survive.
No order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, stand closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[33021
IN THE HIGH COURT FORTHE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
IVIONDAY, THE TWENTYSECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTYFOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRIJUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 30345 OF 2013
Between: --... -n... Ct.,ndraiah, S/o tr/allaiah Aged about 50 years Occ: Agriculture RJo Kodimial village and mandalKarimnagar District
...'ET'T'ONER
AND
1 The Government of AndhraPradesh rep.by its, Principal Secretary, Panchavatrai DepartmentSecretariat,Hyderabad
2 The Disirict Colldctor, KarimangarDistrict- J The District PanchayatOfficer, KarimnagarDistricl--- 4 ffrepuaur GrampanchayatRep.by its Eiecutive Officer' Pudur Gram PanchayatKodimialMandal,KarimnagarDistrict ...RES'ONDENTS
Petition under Article226 oflhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed therewith,the High court maybe pleased to issue a writ, order orDirection more particularlyone in the nature of writ of lvtandamus declaringthe inaction of the Respondent No.4 in non granting permission for construction ofhousein the existing H.No.4-23lAsituated _at irudur village, KodimialI\Iandal, KarimnagarDistrict in pursuanceof the application dated 31.08.2013as arbitrary and illegal and violativeof Articles14, 21 and 3004 of the constitutionof lndia and also violationof provisionsof A.P. parichyat Raj Act 1994 consequently direct the respondents togrant permission for construction of housein accordancewithprovisions of AP Panchyatraj Act 1994
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP. NO: 37665 OF 2013)
Petition under Section151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in supportof the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondent No.4 toconsiderthe applicationdated 31.08.2013 filedto grant of permission for construction of housein the existing H.No. 423lA situated at Pudur village, Kodimial Mandal,Karimnagar District
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRI GUDI MADHUSUDHAN REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent No.1to 3:GP FORPANCHAYAT RAJ Counsel for the Respondent No.4:SRI P. RAGHAVENDRA REDDY
SC FOR TG.MPPS GPPS
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICEK.SARATH
WRIT PETITION No.3O345 of 2O13
ORDER:
Learned Counsel appearing for thepetitioner submits that no further ordersare necessary in this matter and the cause in the WritPetition does not survive and thereby, the Writ Petitionhas become infructuous.
2 Recording thc aforementioned submission,the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.There shall be no order as to costs
.>.) As sequel to it, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
SD/. V. HARI PRASAD ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
\
SECT ON OFFICER
F
BN GJP
HIGH COURT
DATED:2210112024
o s r t1E ST4 i'e
(('(
)
L)-.L 2ll lIlAB 2024 zo
*
O1;.SPA-I CH
ORDER
WP.No.30345 of2013
DISMISSING THEWRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
,AA*y
,&"
T. Indraiah
Government of Andhra Pradesh
District Collector, Karimnagar
District Panchayat Officer, Karimnagar
Grampanchayat Representative, Pudur Gram Panchayat
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
