This judgment dismisses a writ petition filed by a manpower company challenging an order from a tribal welfare society regarding personnel outsourcing. The court found that the cause of action had ceased to exist. (高质量)
Petition dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
132521
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 30076 OF 2016
Between:
M/s RTSS Man Power Solutions, (Formerly M/s Rajan Travels and Security Services) 1-1686/4, Gandhi Nagar, Musieerabad, Hyderabad - 500 0g0. Rep. by itspartner, Smt. B.Lavanya
ANO
...PETIT|ONER
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to grant appropriate relief more in the writ .of MaMamus under Article 226 of the constitution of tndia declaring the Lr.Rc.No.A11202212016, dt. 12.07 .2016 issued by the 1st Respondent is arbitrary, illegat, malafide, discriminatory violating Article 14, 19(1Xg) and 21 of the constitution of lndia apart from violating principles of natural justice and set aside the same and issue consequential directions r{raining the lst Respondent from engaging personnel under outsourcing system from the party respondent and further direct the 1st Respondent to engage personnel under outsourcing system from the petitioner in pursuance of the Agreement arrived at between the petitioner and the lst Respondent by Proceedings Rc.No. A2t6s22t2o1o. dt.24.11.2010 and pay the remuneration to the Petitioner
l.A. NO:'l OF 2016(WPMP . NO: 37205 OF 20161
Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1"t Respondent to engage personnel on outsourcing system only from the Petitioner in pursuance of the Agreement arrived between the 1st Respondent Society and the Petitioner and pay the remuneration to the Petitioner pending disposal of the Writ Petition.
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2016(WPilP. NO : 37206 OF 20161
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to suspend the operation of the Lr.Rc.N o.A11202212016, dt. 12.07.2O16 issued by the 1st Respondent pending disposal of the Writ Petition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P. V. KRISHNAIAH
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI N. BHOOPAL REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE
Counsel for the Respondent No.3:--
The Court made the following: OROER
) \
''t )
HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
WRIT PETITION No.3OO76 OF 2OL6
ORDER:
Heard Sri P. V. Krishnaiah, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri N, Bhoopal Reddy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.1 and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Social Welfare, appearing on behalf of respondent No.2.
".... to issue appropriate relieF more in the Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India declaring the Lr.Rc. No. AU2O22/ 2016 dated L2.O7.IOLG issued by the 1* Respondent is arbitrary, illegal, mala trde, discriminatory violating Articles 14 19(1Xg) and 2l of the Constitution of India apart from violating principles of natural justice and set aside the same and issue consequential directions refraining the 1st Respondent from engaging personnel under outsourcing system from the party respondent and further direct the I't Respondent to engage personnel under outsourcing system from the petitioner in pursuance of the Agreement arrived at between the Petitioner and the 1st Respondent by Proceedings Rc.
2
No.A2/6522/2O10 dared z4.tL.ZOtO and pay rhe remuneration to the Petitioner and pass. ...,.
of the petitioner that the cause of action in the present writ petition does not survive for adjudication any more.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Petition shall also stand closed.
HIGH COURT
DATED:1110912024
ORDER
.i HE SIA r4-
I :) T.
Jt (
1 1 !E[ 2024
{ +
\ 't 'j r)a rc,-t'.
WP.No.30076 of 2016
DISMISS]NG THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTOUS WTHOUT COSTS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition filed by the petitioner regarding outsourcing of personnel remains maintainable or has become infructuous?
M/s RTSS Man Power Solutions
Telangana State Tribal Welfare Residential Educational Institution Society
State of Andhra Pradesh
S.R.Sankaran HR Services Pvt Ltd
SUREPALLI NANDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
