High Court of Telangana disposed of Writ Petition No.15857 of 2023, dismissed as infructuous due to no surviving cause of action, with no costs awarded to the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
13252 7
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEIIBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYFOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICESUREPALLI NANDA
WRIT PETITION NO:15857 OF 2023
Between:
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ofthe constitutionof lndiaprayingthat in the circumstances stated inthe affidavitfiled therewith, the High Courtmaybe pleased to issue writ, order or directionmore particularly in the natureof writ of Mandamus or any otherwrit to declare the inaction of the 5th respondentin implementing the finalorders passed by the 4th respondentin Case No' tu32lLTR/ENR/2022 daled13togt2o22in favourof petitioner against the7th respondent as iltegal, arbitrary,voilative of the Telangana scheduledArea Land Transfer Regulations andconsequently directthe Sth respondentto lmplement
the final order passed by the 4th respondent in Case No. A,/32ILTR/EN RJ2022 daled 1310912022.
lA NO:'f OF 2023
Petition under Section'151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 5th respondent to implement the final order passed by the 4th respondent in Case No. fu32lLTR/ENRlzO22 dated'13109/2022 expeditiously pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SANDEEP KUMAR BOOLA
Gounsel for the Respondent Nos.1,3,4, and 5: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 and 6: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE Counsel forthe Respondent No.7: SRI SHARAT CHANDRA A
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLINANDA
WRIT PETITION o.15857 of 2O23
ORDER:
It is represented by the learned counsel appearingon behalf of thepetitioner thatthe cause of action in the present writ petition doses not survivefor adjudication, any more.
Petition is dismissed as infructuous.However, there
shall be no order as tocosts.
As a sequel, the miscellaneouspetitions ,if any,pending
\
in the Writ Petition shall alsostand closed. ll
tl
SDi- K.AMMAJI
ASSISTANTREGIS /iTRUE COPY//
SECTION FFICER
To, 1. One CC to Sri Sandeep Kumar Bodla, Advocate^[OPUC] ,
i. i*o CCs toGP for Revenue'HighCourt for the Stateof Telangana' at
Hvderabad [OUT]
at Hyderabad[OPUC]Hyderabad[OPUC] a one'Cc io Siisnaratn ChandraA Advocate [oPUC]
/t
TJ LS q
HIGH COURT
DATED:1010912024
ORDER
/ I(
ja-
.)o 2 I tt' ttlZl
.Lb ST'AJ C<br>
WP.No.15857 ot 2023
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS
WITHOUT COSTS.
.C
C,"(.
W
Jama Susheela
State of Telangana
District Collector, Mulugu
Special Deputy Collector, Eturnagaram
Project Officer, ITDA
Gadaboina Srinivas
Surepalli Nanda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
