Writ petition seeking declaration of rejection of land regularization application and stay of dispossession dismissed due to non-prosecution by petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Speciat Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 29516 0F 2014
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, -order or direction, more particurarry a writ in the nature of Writ of MANDAh/US declaring the action of the 'I st respondent herein i.e., Collector, Rangareddy District in rejecting the petitioners a pplication for regularization of their possession of the land in Sy.No.174 at Chandanagar Village, Serilingampaily [\rrandal, RR District vide proceedings No.E5/7164/2010, dated 10-09-2014. as bad, arbil(ary, opposed to law.
LA NO: 1 OF 2014lWPMP NO: 36885 OF 20 141
Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to srAY of dispossession of the 1st petitioner admeasuring an extent of 1500 sq.yards, 2"d petitioner admeasuring an extent of 1500 sq-yards, the 3rd petitroner admeasuring an extent of 480 sq.yards, 4th petitioner admeasuring an extent of 475 sq.yards sth petitioner admeasuring an extent of 475 sq.yards, 6th petitioner admeasuring an extent of 4g5 sq.yards, 7th petitioner admeasuring an extent of 485 sq.yards, gth petitioner admeasuring an extent of 475 sg.yards, gth petitioner admeasuring an extent of 4g0 sq.yards and 1oth petitioner admeasuring an extent of 4g5 sq.yards in Sy.No.174 of chandanagar Virage, Serilingampatly Mandal, RR District, pending disposal of the main writ petition,
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M.VIDYASAGAR
Counsel for the Respondent No.1, 2 & 4: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI RAPARTHI VENKATESH, SC FOR GHMC
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
WRIT PETITION No.29516of 2Ol4
ORDER:
Today. when thematter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearingfor the petitioners submitsthat he has no instructionsfrom the petitionersto pursuethe matter further. Inview of the same, he is unable to proceed further with thematter. Itseems that the petitioners are not interestedto prosecutethis case'.
Non-prosecution. Thereshall be no order as to costs'
Pending miscellaneousapplications,ifany inthis
petition, shall stancl closed
To,
3 Two ccs to GP FoR REVENUE, High court for the state of rerangana at Hyderabad [OUT]
I I
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1911212024
ORDER
WP.No.29516 of 2014
z:'. a
.r. 1r. ST4re
t.( ta] .t
i<br>ci 21 FIB 2025
.,1 .
\i. 0E''..^'.\j'fr' 2'
,..=r--,...-.1-t-
DlSMISSING THE WRIT PETITION
FOR NON.PROSECUTION,
WITHOUT COSTS
cofra}
n
(+- -
6t6.,
Srinivas
Krishna
Krishna
GangadhariAnantha Rao
Gangadhari Yadaiah
Pebbhar
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
