Disposed

Mohammed Akbaruddin @ Mohammed Akbar v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC23 Oct 2024WP/29313/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition alleging non-registration of FIR on a complaint sent by registered post; respondents said the complaint was never received at the station. Court disposed of the petition permitting the petitioner to furnish the complaint copy, directing action in accordance with law per Lalitha Kumari guidelines.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to petitioner to furnish copy of complaint dated 06.09.2024 to respondent No.2, who shall take action in accordance with law per Lalitha Kumari guidelines. No costs.

Mohammed Akbaruddin @ Mohammed Akbar Vs The State of… — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

[³¹⁸³ ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 29313 OF 2024

¶7

Between:

¶8

llolq4meQ^Akbaruddin @^{MohammedAkbar, Aged 61 years, Residihg at 3-5-} 8771151A, Old MLA Quarter, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad, Tel'angana 500029.

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home. Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

¶12

2 The Sub lnspector Of Police, N/alkajgiri Police station .

¶13

...RESPONDENTS

¶14

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of the respondent no.2 for not registering crime against the accused persons as Complaint Submitted by petitioner related to the crime on Ecil. S.O. on 0610912024 at 15.16.43, which was delivered to Hyderabad G.P.O. on 0910912024 at 18.14.59. no enquiry conducted is illegal and arbitrary.

¶15

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶16

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to consequently direct the respondent no.2 to register case against the Accused as the Complaint Submitted by petitioner related to the crime on Ecil S.O. on 0610912024 at 15.16.43, which was delivered to Hyderabad G.P.O. on 0910912024

¶17

at^'18.14.59 and his henchman for tress passing for tress passing rhreatening dire consequence.

¶18

Counsel for the P'etitioner : SRI MD FASIUDDIN

¶19

Counsel for the R.espondents: SRI G.ANIKETH REDDY, ASST.GP FOR HOME

¶20

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶21

1 t

¶22

HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE^{B. VIJAYSENREDDY}

¶23

WRIT PETITION No.2 9313 0F²⁰²⁴

¶24

ORDER:

¶25

This writ^petition is filed^{to declarethe action of respondentNo 2} in not registering the^{First lnformation Report on the complaint of the} petitioner dated 06.09.2024, delivered^{throughRegisteredPost on} 09.09.2024, as^{illegal and arbitrary.}

¶26

Mr. G. Aniketh Reddy,^{learned Assistant GovernmentPleader} for Home,^{producedwritteninstructionsand submittedthat respondent} No.2 verified the^{station recordsand it wasrevealedthat the complaint} of the^{petitionersent through registeredpost has not been received.} The^petitioner did^{not file postal receipt along with the writ petition. As} and when the^{petitioner approaches the Police Station alongwith} written complaint,^{necessary action will be taken'}

¶27

ln view of the^{above, the writ petitionis disposedof granting} liberty to the^{petitioner to furnish copy of the complaintdated} 06.09.2024 to respondent^{No.2. On receipt of such complaint'} respondent No.2 shall^{take action thereon in arcordance with law by} following the^{guidelines issuedby the Honourable Supreme Courtin} Lalitha Kumari v.^{Governmentof U.Pr.No order as to costs'}

¶28

'^{AIR2012sc l5l5}

¶29

¶30

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, if any,^{pending in the}

¶31

writ petition sthnd closed

¶32

SD/- K. AMMAJI ASSISTANT B EGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII L L SECTION OFFICER

¶33

To,

¶34

1 The Principal Secretary,^{Department of Home.Secretariat Buildings, Stateof} Telangana, Hyderabad.

¶35

2 The Sub ln:;pector Of^{Police, Malkajgiri Policestation ,}

¶36

J One CC to SRI IVD FASIUDDIN,^Advocate. IOPUC]

¶37

4 Two CCs tc GP FOR HOME,^{High Court for the Stateof Telangana.} [OUT] 6 Two CD Copies;.

¶38

BSK

¶39

LS ilL (

¶40

HIGH COURT

¶41

DATED:2311012024

¶42

) s
t
t
/J
C
2 3 0tii 204 ()
t
s;'.qt (ll)

¶43

ORDER

¶44

WP.No.29313 of 2024

¶45

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

¶46

.. t{&
;-r^

Mohammed Akbaruddin @ Mohammed Akbar v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammed Akbaruddin @ Mohammed Akbar v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohammad Flamed Hussain Vs The State of Telangana

Devasoth Hanuma, Vs The State of Telangana

Guguloth Bujji Vs The State of Telangana

Mohd. Burhan Shareef, Shamshabad Vs Prl. Secy., M.W. Dept. and 2 Ors.

Shaik Iqbal Ahmed S/o.Shaik Mohammed Vs Ap State Wakf Board

Goranti Srinivas Reddy Vs State of Telangana