Writ petition challenging Wakf Board proceedings and seeking a Managing Committee election for Jamia Mosque, Shamshabad was dismissed for non-prosecution, with the Standing Counsel stating cause did not survive; miscellaneous applications were closed and no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3183 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 6814 OF 2015
Between:
MOHD Burhan Shareef, S/o.Yaseen, Aged about 64 years, Occ. Retd. Police Pensioner, R/o.Gram Panchayat H.No.5-52, Near High School, ln front of Mosque, Shamshabad, Taluqa Shamshabad, District Ranga Reddy
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia prayillg that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the Proceedings No.05/RR/C/201 3, Dated 02.01.2014 of Respondent No.2, as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and against the Wakf Amended Act, 2013 and Wakf Act,'1995 and GO.Ms.No.74, dt.2).11.2OOg and consequently direct the Respondent No.2 to conduct the Managing Committee Election Wakf Property i.e. Jamia Mosque, Shamshabad, as per G.O.Ms.No.74, dt.20.1 1.2009
7
l.A. NO: 1 OF 201S(WPMP. NO: 9063 OF 2015)
Petition unde' Section 151 CPC praying that in the circurrstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court mav be pleased to direct the Respondent No.3 not to interfere in the religious affairs of the Wakf property and its Preacher i.e. Pesh lmam, pending disposal of the above writ petition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M. T. GHORI
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: FARHAN AZAM KHAN (SC FOR TSWB)
The Court made the following: ORDER
.a:a:.'
HONOTJRABLE SRIJUSTICE B. YIJAYSEN REDDY
WRIT PETITIONNo.6E14 0F 201s
ORDER:(ORAL)
Mr. Farhan AzamKhan,leamed Standing Counsel for the Wakf Board, submittedthat cause in this writ petitiondoes not survive requiring any adjudication.
As the matteris of 2015, it is being listed underthe caption for 'specially Identified Cases'at 2-15 p'm'Despitethe same' there is no representation forthe petitioner.
In the circumstances,the writ petition is dismissed for
non-prosecution.No orderas to costs.
As a sequel thereto,miscellaneousapplications,if any' pending
in the writpetition stand closed.
Assrsri3+-Effivr'Ilt
To
/ITRUECOPY'/
SECTIOF,FFICER
rnfft'rre angana a'i </sup>
1 il,;itffi#i:"[iiiiJ'i"']"J TJ LS
+*
HIGH COURI-
DATED:2311012024
ORDER
WP.No.6814 of 2015
1HE SI,I I4
(
o 1 3 [E[ 2024 z
{
Or.o
-:.--;-;-.-'
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NONPROSECUTION
WITHOUT COSTS
+w
P,
Mohd Burhan Shareef
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Minority Welfare Department
Andhra Pradesh State Wakf Board, Rep. by its Chief Executive Officer
Mohd. Yousuf Ali Khan
B. Vijaysen Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
