The High Court of Telangana dismissed the petitioner's writ petition, which challenged the deletion of his name from revenue records and sought restoration based on a previous judgment, after the counsel for the petitioner sought and was granted permission to withdraw the petition.
None. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[31681
HIGH COURTFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(SPecial OriginalJurisdiction)
MONDAY, THEEIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSANDANDTWENTYFOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLESRIJUSTICE K'LAKSHMAN
, WRIT PETITION NO:29 273 0F 2021
Betvveen:
Mohd. AbdulKhader, S/o.Mohd. AbdulRasheed,-1|Oe 7O years' R/o'16-1- i4ji, 2;liit Ht;iain-Cbronv,saidabad, Hvderabad59 ...pErroNER
AND
R6 impleadedas per C.O.d1'2OOg 2023 in lA No' 'ot'0"
...*=T'ONDENTS
.Petition underArticle226 of lhe Constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the circumstancesstatedin the affidavitfiledtherewith'the High Courtmay be pleased to issue aWrit of Mandamus or any 6ther appropriateWrit,orderor Orders,DirectionorDirectionstodeclar:etheactionofthe3rdrespondentin deleting thename of the petitioner from the revenue records in the year 2016'17 and enteringthe nanie of the 4th respondent in his place and thereafter the name of the 5threspondentin respect of the landsin Survey numbers329 to 350of PeddapurVillage,AlladurghMandal,MedakDistrict'asillegal'contrarytothelaw laiddownbythisHonbleCourtin200sAlRAP15andtoissueaconsequential directiontothe3rdrespondenttodeletethenamesof4thandSthrespondents andtorestorethenarneofthepetitionerintherevenuerecordsinrespectofthe subject
IANO:1O F m21 Petition under Section151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstances statedin theaffidavitfiledinsupportofthepetition,theHighCourtmaybepleasedTo direct the 3rdrespondentnot to entertain any further mutationsin respect of the landinSurveynumber32gto35OofPeddapurVillage,AlladurghMandal'Medak District,pending disposalof writ petition
Counsel for thePetitioner:SMT.VEDULACHITRALEKHA
Counsel for RespondentNos. 1 to 3: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for RespondentNo.4: SRIKASOJU YADAGIRI
Counsel for RespondentNo. 6: SRIK' SAI BABU
The Court madethe following:ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAIT
WRIT PEIITION No.29273 of 2O2L
ORDER:
Smt.Vedula Chitralekha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner filed a letter dated 26-03-2024before the Registry seeking permission of this Courtto withdraw
the present writ petition.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissedas
withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, the miscellaneouspetitions, ifany,
pending in the Writ Petition shall stand closed.
SD/- T.JAYASREE
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
I/TRUE COPY'/
SECTTON OFFICER
To,
1. One CC toSmt. Vedula Chitralekha Advocate IOTUCI
2. i;; ca.'io cP Foinerenue, *igh Court for the statri of Telangana' [ouT]
3. One CC to Sri Kasoju Yadagiri, Advogqte(OPUC)
4. One CC to Sri K. Sdi Babu, Advocate(OPUC)
5. Two CD Copies
MBC
GJP ..\r'
HIGH cOURT
t
DATED: 0810412024
1H ri
k
,(
J,J 1 6 APB 2024
I vza
*
t) r:SPATCH s-O
ORDER
WP.No.29273 of 2021
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION AS
WITHDRAWN, WITHOUT COSTS
i\ w'3
q\zq
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Mohd. Abdul Khader
State of Telangana
Chief District Collector, Medak District
Mohd. Khadeeruddin Siddiqui
Looparalli Lakshma Reddy
K. Lakshman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
