Dismissed

Pabba Hari Prasad Goud v. The State of Telangana and 5 Others

Telangana HC8 Apr 2024WP/18554/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner prayed for disposal of Writ Petition No. 18554 of 2020 and related miscellaneous petition via withdrawal. Court granted permission for withdrawal with liberty to file fresh petition and dismissed main writ as withdrawn without costs.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition; writ dismissed as withdrawn without costs.

Pabba Hari Prasad Goud Vs The State of Telangana… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

[³¹⁶⁸ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 18554 OF 2020

¶8

I^Between:

¶9

Pabba Hari Prasad Goud, S/o: Pabba Sathyanarayana Goud, Aged About 55 years, Occ. Service, R/o. 13-3-131/30'l , Vikas Naar, Chaithanyipuri, Opp E- Seva. Hyderabad - 500 060.

¶10

,,.PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

1 The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Stamps and Registration Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

¶13

2 The District Collector, Medchal-l/alkajgiri District

¶14

3 The Tahsild a r, Medchal [t/andal, t\rledchal-Malkajgiri District.

¶15

4 The Sub-Registrar, Stamps and Registration Office, fVledchal, tVedchalIt/alkaj giri District.

¶16

5 Adla Naresh, S/o.Komuraiah, Aged About 31 Years, Occ. Private Employee, Rlo. 1-7 -29211 , Pragathi Nagar, Road No.2, Subedari, Revenue Coloiry,Hanamkonda, Warangal -506001 .

¶17

6 Shyam Kumar Enagandula, S/o. Bhoornaiah Enagandula, Aged about 32 t9ars,^{OcrcPrivate Employee,Rl/o. D-96, I,,landa Marri, 3rd Zone, Kalyani} Khani, Adilabad - 504231 .

¶18

...RESPONDENTS

¶19

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent No.3 not to entertain any application from Respondent No.6 for mutation of his name in Revenue Records in respect of land in Survey No.355, 359 and 352 total admeasuring 22 Guntas covered by Sale deed dated 14-07 -2O2O bearing Document No. 5868 of 2020. |

¶20

¶21

lA NO: 1 OF 2o2o

¶22

Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit frled in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to Restrain the Respondent No.6 from seling or arienating the rand in survey No. 355, 359 and 352 totar admeasuring 22 Guntas covered by Sare deed dated .1407 -2o2o bearing Document No. 5868 of 2o2o pending the disposar of the above main Writ Petition.

¶23

Counsel for the Petitioner: M/S M. MANJUSHA BHARDWAJ

¶24

Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 to 4: Gp FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION

¶25

Counsel forthe Respondent No.6: SRt KONDANT AJAY KUMAR

¶26

Counsel for the Respondent No.5:---

¶27

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶28

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN

¶29

WRIT PETITION No.18554 of^2O2O

¶30

ORDER:

¶31

Ms.Manjusha Bharadwaj, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner hled a letter^dated t8-O3-2O24 before the Registry seeking^{permissionof this} Court to withdraw the present writ^{petition with a liberty} to hle fresh Writ Petition.

¶32

Permission is accorded.

¶33

Granting liberty AS sought, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as^to costs.

¶34

As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if^any,

¶35

pending in the Writ Petition shall stand closed.

¶36

SD/- P. PADMANABHA R DDY ASSISTANT REGI RAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

1 One CC to lr,4/s. M. Manjusha Bhardwal, Advocate [OPUC] 2 One CC to Sri Kondadi Ajay Kumar, Advcoate[OPUC] J Two CCs to GP for Stamps And Registration, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] 4 Two CD Copies TJ GJP

8,$

HIGH COURT

DATED:0810412024

ORDER

1 ltE Sf/| 14:
(o G
J:) (
i-) 0 5 JU,',l 2024 'a
t,,
l,'-
-D, .:,;r,., i-cH r-0

¶49

WP.No.18554 of 2020

¶50

i DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN

¶51

WITHOUT COSTS.

¶52

,y<br>?p<br>A

Pabba Hari Prasad Goud v. The State of Telangana and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pabba Hari Prasad Goud v. The State of Telangana and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P. Nirmala Vs The State of Telangana

Chandupatla Krishna Vs The State of Telanaga

Ganganaboyina Sathaiah Vs The State of Telangana

Nunavath Chinna Shankar Vs Shri. Ram Kumar

J.Boyi Reddy Vs State of Telangana

Mohd. Abdul Khader Vs State of Telangana