High Court of Telangana dismissed a writ petition and miscellaneous application for non-prosecution. The petitioner failed to appear via video conferencing or in person on the listed date, resulting in the dismissal of the matter without costs.
The writ petition was dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[325s ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 28635 OF 201s
Betwee n:
Shaik Rahamatulla, S/o Abdul Gaffoor, aged about 63 years, R/o. H. No.9-3-54, Contractor Basthi BellampalliPost, Adilabad District.
.....PETITIONER
AND
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the 2nd respondent in giving instructions to the 3rd respondent to correct the Sy.No. 5/33 as Sy.No. 5/19 in the registered Document No.1006/88 and to order for validation of the said document against thelands records of Sy.No. 5119 of Pe(danapalli village, Kasipet Mandal, Adilabad District, inspite of the written representation dt.23-32015 followed by repeated visits, as being illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the 2nd respondent togive necessary orders to the 3rd respoindent for correction of the Survey Number from Sy.No. 5/33 to 5/19 in the registered Doc.No.1 006/88.
l.A.NO:1 OF 2015 (WPMP.NO: 37117 0F 20151
Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.2 herein to consider and pass appropriate orders on the representation dt.23.03.2015, pending disposal of the above Writ petition, in the interest ofjustice.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI PRADEEP KUMAR KANDALA
Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following ORDER
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.28635 of 7O15
ORDER:
When the matter was on 14.11 .2024, there was no representation on behatf of the petitioner and then the matter was directed to be listed under the caption 'For Dismissat.'
non-prosecution. There shatt be no order as to costs.
As a sequet, miscettaneous applications, if any pending, shatI stand ctoseci.
/
SD/. P.Ch. NAGABHUSHAMBA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To
' Iyo""?"t;l: St io* REVENUE' Hish court ror the state or retangana at
HIGH COURT
DATED:2211112024
ORDER
STArA:
,t
za
.b
l))t 0l itB rffii
t,. - lt
."r *
, ir palt l
WP.No.28635 of 2015
DISMISSING THE W.P
FOR NON_ PROSECUTION
WITHOUT COSTS.
1.t6 zly' ./<s
Shaik Rahamatulla
The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue (Stamps and Registration) Department
The District Collector, Adilabad District
The Sub-Registrar, Mancherial
SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
