The High Court dismissed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging registered gift deeds on the grounds that the cause of action had become infructuous due to the efflux of time.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
tr
I f I
[3255 ]
HIGH RT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD {SpecialOriginalJurisdiction)
FRIDAY, TFIE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOUFABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
PETITION 819 0F 2017
Between:
.....PETITIONER
AND
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Arti cle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the ! circumstances stated ir1 the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
\
/
t,'
pleased to issue a writl order or direction morein the nature of[ilandamus declare the R,:gisteredi Gift SettlementDeedsDocumentNos.242712008' Rectification Deed Doc0mentNo. 103/2009,377 t2OO6 and 388/2006 of Sub Registrars Office, Bheenigal and Armoorrespectively in favour of respondents 4 and 5 respectively as $eing illegalin view of violation of Section 23 of the Transfer of Property Abt and direct the officialrespondents to resumethe possession of the said pfoperties and handover the sameto Smt. Safiya Begum, mother of thepetitioner /irespondents4 and 5.
I.A.NO:1 OF 2017 WPMP.NO:22950OF 2017
Petition tJnder Section 151 CPCpraying thatin the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in supp6rt of thepetition,the High Court may be pleased to pass appropriate orders on the representation ofthe petitionerdated 28.03.2017 (submitted on 30.03.201t) with regard to cancel and revocationof registeredGift Settlement Deeds Docu{nent Nos.2427of 2008, Rectification DeedDocument No. 103/2009, 377|2OOG and 388/2008, ofSub Registrar's OfficeBheemgal and Armoor respeclively in fdvour ofRespondents4 and 5 respectively by taking into consideration Section 23'of the Transferof property Act.
Counsel for thr: Petitioner :SRID.BALA KISHANRAO
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.'|,8 to10 : AGPFOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: G.PFORSOCTALWELFARE
Counsel for the Respondent ,, Nos.3& 7: GP FOR WOMEN DEVELOPMENTAND CHILD WELFARE I
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 to 6: -
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.9& l0 : -
The Court made the following ORDER
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.18819 OF 2017
ORDER:
Today when the matter has been taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous.
petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
closed. No order as to costs.
\ I ; SD/.MOHD. ISMAIL .-- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR I /iTRUE COPY// CTION OFFICER I To t{ I 1. Two CCs to GP Fdn REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at I Hyderabad. [OUTl I 2. Two CCs to GP WOMEN DEVELOPMENT AND CHILD WELFARE I High Court for the tate of Telangana at Hyderabad. tOUI 3. Two CCs to GP F IAL WELFARE, High Court for tfu State of I Te{angana at Hyd ad. ouTl i \I I 4. One CC to SRI D. I 5. Two CD Copies KISHAN RAO, Advocate [OPUC] SA I w I I
(
HIGH COUTIT
DATED:2211112024
ORDER
\E TAl €
1 U
)^
<br>1B TTB ?[25 -_i t'
o5,)q
{'..
Vrz ..f
/)r,3rr rf
WP.No.18819 of 2017
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
@
k-<
(v^'
Abdul Shafi
District Collector, Nizamabad
Director, Welfare of Disabled and Senior Citizens
State of Telangana
Abdul Rafi
Smt. Sajida Begum
N.V. SHRAVAN KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
