Writ petition challenging a Cooperative Tribunal order was dismissed for non-prosecution after counsel reported no instructions from the petitioner to pursue the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 17152 OF 2o1'l
Between:
Dr. Suri Sreemathi, D/o. S.R. Deexitulu retired Medical officer R/o.12-'10-31, Seethafalmandi, Secunderabad
...PETITIONER
AND
(Since the Conditional Order dated 16.04.2015 has not been complied with, W.P. stands dismissed as against Respondent No.2 & 5 as per the said order)
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly writ of Certrorari calling for the records leading up to passing of the impugned order daled 23.'12.2010 in
I
CTA.No.S0 of 2009 by the 1st respondent and thereby quash the same as erroneous, unjustified perverse contrary to law, facts and circumstances.
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2011(WPM P. NO:2 o605 0F 2011
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 23.12.2010 in CTA.No.5O of 2009 passed by the 1st respondent pending disposal of the above writ petition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI CH. RAVINDRA BABU
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 & 2: GP FOR COOPERATION
Counsel forthe Respondent No.3: SRI T.S. PRAVEEN KUMAR (sc FoR APSCSC LTD)
Counsel for the Respondent No.4 to 7: - - - -
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
WRIT PETITION No.17152 of 2O1l
ORDER:
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that 1n spite of issuing letters to the petitioner, he hasno instructions from the petitioner to pursue the matter further. In view of the same, he is unable toproceed further with the matter. It seems that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute this case.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any in this petition, shall stand closed.
assrsrfr?fJiS[VJIXfl //TRUE coPY// sec&rc.*
\
'o',one cc to SR, cH Sxqgffrii^iii.jgi9lli?tR533le LrD).Lor,u:r^^a \ 3 ?,13 33 Jif$i';3J A65FERA;b'i,i, ri6 r, c"..;)t?..jt'Js"tL-,jt f e'ans'an
BN, l?l'Jo ""0,". LS w
:
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:1310912024
ORDER
1 'ag S I;A,I€
L) 13 [Ee 202+
rl
sr,.l..Jr-.
WP.No.17152 of 2011
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITTON FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
*
p<br>
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dr. Suri Sreemathi
The AP Cooperative Tribunal, Secretary
The Arbitrator/Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies
K.Parvathi
Kalyan Nagar Co-operative Housing Society Ltd
B.Veera Swamy
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
