Dismissed

Sai Krishna Gas Distributors v. Deputy Commissioner State Taxes

Telangana HC28 Nov 2024WP/27191/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana dismissed Writ Petition No. 27191 of 2024 as withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel, with liberty to file a fresh petition. The application had challenged an order under the Taxation Acts. The High Court allowed the withdrawal without costs.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition; interlocutory applications closed.

Sai Krishna Gas Distributors Vs Deputy Commissioner State Taxes — Income Tax | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

[³⁴¹¹ 1

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

THURSDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO

¶6

WRIT PETITION N O:27191 0F 2024

¶7

Between:

¶8

SAI KRISHNA GAS DISTR|I!]TORS-. Represented by its proprietor Smt. AHIKA GANDHAM, 239/4, BHEL phase Z, N/aaindguda, ffirO"ijOrO - 500050 Dist. Ranga Reddy

¶9

AND

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

1 Deputy^ COiViViSSIONER State Taxes, Aditabad Division, H.No.9/6, 2nd FIoor. Chandra Hero Complex, Sai Nagar. Dasnapur Adilabad. 2 Ihe Commissiner of State Taxes, State of Te'tangana Commercial Taxes Qomplex^{l,4J Road. Nampally.Hyderabad.} 3 The State of Telangana,- Represented by its principal Secretarv to .,overnment Hevenue commercial rax Department secretariat Hyderabai.

¶12

...RESPONDENTS

¶13

Petitron under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring order passed by the Joint commissioner, Adirabad, Under Section 73 and 74 of the TGST and CGST Act,2o1t Date of odet 3olo4-2024 reference no. 2D360424087 8241 For the year financial year 2018/1g, as atbitraty illegal bad in law without jurisdicilon void abinitio violative of principles - -of Na tural Justice rt from- beinq olative t Article tr 9 and -26 on taa -con s e =ame-t s

¶14

justice

¶15

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶16

Petition under section 1s1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including any recovery, pursuant to the order passed by the Joint commissioner, Adirabad, Under Section 73 and 74 of the TGST and GGST Act, 2017 Date of order 3olo4t2o24 reference no. 2D36o424o878241 For the Year financial Year 2018119 pending disposal of writ petition

¶17

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRt. GAJANAND CHAKRAVARTY REp SRI UPADHYAY RAGHAVENDER

¶18

Counsel for the Respondents: SRI SWAROOP OORILLA,

¶19

SPECIAL GOVT PLEADER FOR STATE TAX

¶20

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶21

-i--..;----ii_.ilE-_-*..-+ _. - t-.

¶22

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND

¶23

THE HONOURABLE SRI .IUSTICE NAMAVARAPU^{RAJESH1VAR RAO}

¶24

WRIT PETITION No.27191 OF 2024

¶25

ORDER:^(per Hon'ble Justice Sujog^Paul)

¶26

Sri Gajanand Chakaravarty, learned counsel^representing Sri Upadhyay Raghavender, learned counsel^{for the petitioner, seeks} to withdraw this petition with liberty to file^{fresh petition.}

¶27

2, Sri Swaroop Oorilla, learned Special Government^Pleaderfor State Tax, for respondents has no objection.

¶28

Accordingly, Writ Petition is dismissed as^{withdrawn with} liberty prayed for. No costs.

¶29

Interlocutory applications, if any^{pending,shall also stand}

¶30

closed.

¶31

SD/. T. JAYASREE //TRUE coPY// ASSISTANT1 REGIsTRAR

To,

SECTION OFFTCER

One CC to SRl. Upt 2 i;; c6, L tireErti85tltrfi ElflYilPIBiadvocate ropuc l Court for the State of cD copies^{reransan;' ;t-Hval,i'#0"'r3,lr?* stRre rAx ' uign} . Jff uGJP

HIGH COURT

DATED:2811112024

ORDER

WP.No.27191 of 2024

M SSIN G E .WR UTCO .=.---;.ii;-;i:i---c

¶41

1HE Sr.q L.
7 (r^
(<br>oo t
0 6 JAN 2025 t)
+
O5sp,,TCr,

¶42

TITION AS WITHD RAW N

¶43

.__ki -. r _.i a -in

¶44

--l_Ei--.___

¶45

6
["tt'
4Yl

Sai Krishna Gas Distributors v. Deputy Commissioner State Taxes

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sai Krishna Gas Distributors v. Deputy Commissioner State Taxes

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mrs.Kontham Sugunalatha Vs The Assessment Unit, National Faceless Assessment Centre (Nfac)

Mrs. Kontham Sugunalatha Vs The Assessment Unit

Shaik Sardar Vs K. Varun Reddy

Ch. V.K. Sai Ram, Vs District Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission

Medikonda Venkata Ramaiah Chowdary Vs Prl. Secy., Medical and Family Welfare

The Director of Public Health and Family Welfare and 3 others Vs Ch. Johnson and 9 others