High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 26854 of 2012 for non-prosecution. The petitioner failed to appear on two consecutive listing dates despite notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I325s I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERAAAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
IVONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. SHRAVAN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 26854 OF 2012
Between:
Sri 9atguruYogananda SaraswathiSwamiji, 1Oth tvlathadhipathi, Ramachandra Gopala Krishna [.4atham, Adlla6ad, Adilabad District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate writ, order or direction especially one in the nature of Writ of Ar'landamus declaring the orders of the Government issued vide IVlemo No.44779lEndt.l( 1 )12011-1, dated 26-11-2O1'1 as itlegal and void and directing the official respondents herein to desist from acting thereon.
$
' l.A. NO: 1 OF 2012 WPMP. NO:34199 0F 2012)
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Courtmay be pleasedto suspend the order of the Governrnentissued vide lVemoNo' 44779lEndl.l(1)12011-1, dated 26-11-2O11,pending disposalof the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V.L.N.G.K.MURTHY
Counsel for the RespondentNo.1 to 5: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
Counsel for the Respondent No.7 &8: SRI NARESH REDDY CHINNOLLA
Counsel for the Respondent No.6:- - - -
The Court made the following: ORDER
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION N0.26854 of 2012
ORDER:
On 01.08.2024, when the matter was taken up for hearing, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner and the matter was listed to today under the caption,for dismissal,. Even today also, when the matter is taken up in the morning session, none appeared for the petitioner, thereafter the matter was passed over and taken up in the aftemoon session, even then, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner either physically or in virtual mode. Hence, there is no other option to this Court except to dismiss the Writ petition for nonprosecution.
As sequei to it, Miscellaneouspetitions, if any pending, shall stand disrnissed.
SD/-8. SARASWATHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//
-+ SECTI oN'O FFICER
To,
d.c,
I I
HIGHCOURT
DATED:0510812024
ORDER
WP.No.26854of 2012
<)/.
,(
1E L1
r)
\l'z/./ )L::l i ,,.. r c
.&brsrvrrsstNc THE wRtr PETtrtoN :$FoR NoN-PRosECUrloN }WITHoUT COSTS
Sri Raghuraj Yogananda Saraswathi Swamiji
Government of Andhra Pradesh
N.V. Shравan Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
