The High Court for the Telangana dismissed a writ petition (filed in 2011) seeking a writ of mandamus for non-prosecution/default. No representation was filed by petitioners when the matter was called for hearing on 04.12.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
I /RlT PETITION NO: 26153 OF 2011
Betwee n:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the order in case No. Fit92212009 dated 6th lr,,,lay, 2o11 of the respondent No.1 is highly illegal, unreasonable, arbitrary, discriminatory, unjust, contrary to the provisions of the Act and unconstitutio nal being violative of principles of natural justice, articles '14 and 1g of the constitution of lndia besides being opposed to all canons of equity.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2011 :wPMP. NO: 32267 0F 20111
Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the order in case No. F1192212009 dated 6th May, 2O11 of the respondent No.1.
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI K.RAJENDRAN (NOT PRESENT)
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Gp FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.2 to 6: M/s. MADHAVI pRlyA MANTENA
The Court made the following: ORDER
fi
THE HONOURABLE SRJ JUSTICE K.SARATH
WRI? PETI TION No.2615 3 of2O11
ORDER:
This writ petition is coming for hearing since 201 1. On 13.II.2O24 when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners, and therefore, the matter was directed to be listed on 04. 12.2024 under the caption "for dismissal". Even today i.e., 04.12.2024 when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It seems that the petitioners are not interested to prosecute this case.
To,
SD/- A. SRINIVAS REDDY ASSISTANT R ISTRAR //TRUE COPY// \ SECTION OFFICER
I I I I
t
HIGH COUR:T
DATED: 041'1212024
1HE Sl4 / A
(
)
O
2t rEB 2025
t
O5sPAfcqEo
ORDER
WP.No.26153 ot 2011
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION
FOR NON.PROSECUTION/DEFAULT,
WITHOUT COSTS
+(9se4 F 6I{a'
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Kothala Varudu Janardhan
Kothala Srisailam
Andem Sanjeeva Reddy
The Joint Collector, R.R.East Division, R.R.District
Smt. Chalasani Rada Das
Smt Chalasani Venkata Sujatha
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
