The High Court of Telangana dismissed Writ Petition No. 26135 of 2013 for non-prosecution. The petitioner was absent, and the Bench opined that the petitioner was not interested in pursuing the matter.
The Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3300 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF TVIARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION NO: 26135 OF 2013
Between
R.R.G.R.P. lndustries, Rep. by its Prop. L. Ramanjaneyulu, S/o. L.C. Hanumappa, Aged about 44 years, Occ ; business Caste S.C. R:/o. No. 1-1-542, Flat No. 403, Royal Spectrum Apartments, Jawahar Nagar, Hyderabad.
.....PETITIONER
AND
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more pa(icularly one in the nature of Writ of fvlandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.4 issuing notice dated 5.8-2013 in regard to proposed action of recovery by seizing and selling the factory of the Petitioner R.R.G.R.P. industries situated in Plot No. L35182, APIIC (GlP), Jadcherla, Mahaboob Nagar District without considering the request of the Petitioner and dispose of application of the Petitioner dated 25.3.2O13 as illegal, arbitrary and un.just and against the principles of natural .justiceconsequentlydirect the Respondentnot to take any fu(hersteps till the dispose of the above application dated 25.3.2013.
|.A.NO:1 OF 2013 (WPM P.NO:32292 OF 2013)
Petition under section i 5i cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to take any steps of seizing of petitioner,s factory R.R.G.R.P. industries situated in ptot No. L3S|B2, ApllC (Gtp), Jadcherla, Mahaboob Nagar District.
I.A.NO:2 OF 2013 (WPMP.NO:32 87s OF 2013)
Between
R.R.G.R.P. lndustries. Rep. by itsprop. L. Ramanjaneyulu, S/o. L.C. Hanumappa, Aged about 44 y.ears. Occ ; business Caste S.C.'R/o.- No. 1-1-542, ffit f.fo.-ibS, Royal Spectrum Apartments, Jawahar Nagar, Hyderabad.
.....PETITIONER
AND
.....RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
...PROPOSED RESPONDENT
Petition Under Sectron 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to implead the Respondent No.5 as one of the Respondent to the above writ Petition No. 26'133 of 2013.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI MOHAMMED ABDUL KHADER
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : Gp FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 4 : M/s.y.N.LOH|THA
The Court made the following ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
ORDER:
WRIT PETITION No.26 135 of 2O13
When the matter was taken up for hearing on 27 .O2.2024, there was no representation for petitioner and therefore, the matter was directed to be listed today i.e., on 05.03.2024 under the caption ,,For Dismissal,,. Even today, when the matter is taken up, there is no representation on behalf of learned counsel for petitioner.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in the writ petition, shall stand closed.
\
S D/.MOHD SANAULLAH ANSARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// /.\a/ SECTION OFFICER
To
' Iy;"":rn::3iil'Revenue'High courtror the state or rerangana at 2. One CC to Sri Mohammed Abdul Khader, Advocate tOpUCJ 3 one cC ro M/s.y N.Lohitha. Ad;o";i;i6pu;i"".,' 4. Two CD Copies
SA SB &
I !
I I I I
HIGH COURT
DATED:0510312024
ORDER
WP.No.26135 of 2013
1t IE S14f €
(
1J (
o F
I'r 1 5 APB 2024
i_.
* *
€..;p416gi
DISMISSING THE W.P
FOR NON_ PROSECUTION
WITHOUT COSTS.
@qt &e.--ilnVft
R.R.G.R.P. Industries
The State of A.P.
A.P. State Financial Corporation
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
