Higher Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 26005 of 2009 and Miscellaneous Petition No. 1 of 2009 for want of prosecution, finding petitioners were not interested in proceeding, without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[33s3 ]
HIGH COURTFORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY ,THE FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEALOK ARADHE THE HONOURABLE . SRI JUSTICE ANDANIL KUMAR JUKANTI
WRIT PETITION NO: 26005OF 2009
Between:
AND
Petition under Article226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances statedrn the affidavit filedtherewith, the High court maybe pleased to issue a writ order ordirection particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus drrecting therespondentNos 2 and 3 to takeapproprialeaction against the respondentNos 4 to 6 to stop the constructionsbeing made at EFLU campus, osmaniaUniversitycampus,Greater Hyderabad Municipalcorporation declaring theirinactionas illegal, and ultra virus and violativeof Articles14 and
21 of the constitutionof lndia besidesbeing in violation of Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act andthe rules framed there under on the subject
l.A. NO:2 OF2009(WPMP. NO: 33861 0F 2009)
petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstancesstat;d in the affidavitfiled in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondentNos 4 to 6 to stopthe constructions being made at EFLU campus of osmaniaUniversitycampus, Greater Hyderabad Municipalcorp. pending final disposal of the writpetition
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2009
P. NO:4331 OF 2009
Between:
The English & ForergnLanguages UniversityRep by its Registrar,EFLU Campus, Hyderabad-500605 ....PETITIONER
AND
I Ceiiiiar Visilin"" Commissron,Rep. by Chief, Vigilance Commisioner,Satar Kata Bhav-an' INAMarket' New Delhi
Petition under Section151 CPC praying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filedin support of the petition, the High courtmaybe pleasedto
vacate the orderspassed in wP NO. 26005of 2009 dated30-1 1-2009 in the interest of justice
Counsel for thePetitioner:SRl. RAVI KUMARTOLEW
Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: SRIGADI PRAVEENKUMAR' (DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERALOF INDIA)
Counsel for the RespondentNos. 2: SRI C. DAMODAR REDDY (sc FoR GHMC)
Counsel for.the RespondentNo.3: SRI R. RAMACHANDRA REDDY' SC FOR GHMC
Counsel for the RespondentNos.4to5: SRI K. RAMKANTH REDDY
Counsel for theRespondent No'6&7: None Appeared
The Court made thefollowing:ORDER
!
II i
i I i I I i
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEFJUSTTCE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANILKUMARJUKANTI
WRTT PETITION No.26005 of 2009
ORPER; (per the Hon,ble rhe Chief Justice Alok Aradhe)
None for the parties.
It appears that the petitioners are not interested in
prosecuting the writ petition.
The writ petition ls therefore dismissed for want of prosecution.
Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
SD/.T. JAYA EE ASSISTANT RE IS
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION O ICER
To,
6, Two CD Copies
*BJ
HIGH COURT
DATED:0410112024
ORDER
WP.No.26005of 2009
,{ $e STATA
q t
I E iiB ?02[ D
ooJ
,t
* DE PA t-
DISMISSINGTHE WRIT PETITION FOR NONPROSECUTIONWITHOUT COSTS
.$-<br>$r/
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be adjudicated when the petitioners have abandoned prosecution.
Whether to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution and to close miscellaneous pending petitions.
Bontha Rammohan
Nevuri Dharmender
Union of India
State of Telangana
Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
English and Foreign Languages University
Alok Aradhe
Anil Kumar Jukanti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
