Disposed

Mancherla Renuka Reddy v. Muddasani Girija Reddy

Telangana HC4 Jan 2024WA/237/2023

Case brief

AI extract

Interlocutory applications allowed for condonation of delay and dispensing with certified copy; main writ appeal disposed of vide separate judgment.

AI extract

Mancherla Renuka Reddy Vs Muddasani Girija Reddy — Telangana HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

¶2

MAIN CASE No: Writ Appeal No.237 of 2023

¶3

PROCEEDING SHEET

S. No.	DATE	ORDER	OFFICE NOTE
2.	04.01.2024	CJ & JAK, J I.A.No.1 of 2023
		Mr. Vedula Srinivas, learned Senior Counsel represents Ms. Vedula Chitralekha, learned counsel for the appellants. Heard on I.A.No.1 of 2023, an application seeking condonation of delay of 276 days in filing the appeal. For the reasons assigned in the application, duly supported by an affidavit, we find that sufficient cause for condonation of delay of 276 days in filing the appeal is made out. In the result, delay in filing the appeal is condoned and the aforesaid Interlocutory Application is allowed. I.A.No.2 of 2023 Mr. Vedula Srinivas, learned Senior Counsel represents Ms. Vedula Chitralekha, learned counsel for the appellants. Heard on I.A.No.2 of 2023, an application seeking to dispense with the requirement of filing certified copy of the order dated 21.04.2022, passed by the learned Single Judge, in W.P.No.20334 of 2022.

For the reasons assigned in the	application,
duly supported by an affidavit, the req	uirement of
filing certified copy of the order dated	21.04.2022,
passed by the learned Single Judge, in W. of 2022 is dispensed with. In the result, the Interlocutory A allowed.	P.No.20334 pplication is
	_________ CJ (AAJ)
	_________ JAK, J
CJ & JAK, J
Writ Appeal is disposed of. (vide separate judgment) B/o Lur