Writ petition sought directions to AICTE to consider representations and supply documents and information. Counsel submitted the grievance stood redressed pursuant to interim orders; the Court recorded this and closed the writ petition with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3166 ]
HlcH COURT FOR Tt1 LA N G A N A AT HYj5"iif,I,[,:: ( s pe c ia, ;E
",,
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENT' FOUR'"
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 23452 0F 2023
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more in the nature of
I
Mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondents No 2 and 3 in considering Representations of the 1st Petitioner daled 07to6t2022, o\togl2o22, o}to2l2o23, 0710212023 and o8/0212023, as being illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles l4 and 21 of the constitution of lndia and consequenfly direct the Respondents No. 2 and 3 to supply documents and information sought by the petitioners in representations dated 07t06t2022, 08t09t2022, o3to2t2o23, 07t02t2023 and 0810212023 to the 1st Petitioner herein and direct Respondents No 2 and 3 to initiate appropriate legal proceedings including penal action against the concerned individuals and officials as requested in the said represenlations.
lA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under section 15i cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No 2 and 3 to consider the petitioners representations dated 0710612022, 08t09t2022 o3to2tzoz3, oilo2t2oz3 and 08t02t2023 and furnish to the l st Petitioner, the documents and information sought therein, pending disposal of this Writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI YEMMIGANUR SOMA SRINATH REDDY
Counsel for the Respondents: M/S T. SUHASINI
Counsel for the Respondent No..t: SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR, DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA
Counsel for the Respondent No.2 and 3: SRI M. MAHABOOB ALl, SC
Counsel for the Respondent No.4 and 6: Gp FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SRI MOHAMMAD ABDULeUDDUS Counsel for the Respondent No.7: SMT. M. SHALINI
The Court made the following: ORDER
--7
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR
Writ Petitio n No.23452 of 2023
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the
interim orders passed by this Court, the grievance of the petitioner in the present Writ Petition stands redressed and no further orders are necessary to be passed.
3, Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall
stand closed.
SD/-A.V.S.P AD RAR ASSISTANTR
,TRUECOPY// SECTIONOFICER
to' ", on" cc to sri Yemm iganu r soma Srrnath.R:11*,it3i3l3lStifflrot'"r i Effi gE I il m:lf**lnnurlnt'l,1""a,eropUC] sTwoCCstoTheGPforHigherE.ducation.HighCourtfortheStateof' i#;;;;: ai ir-YoerauaolOeucl
6
I'
HIGH COURT
DATED:23l'1012024
ORDER
WP.No.23452of 2023
t*.
't tl E S Tri 7g
o 1 1 oEC 2024 ,lI
t' ,/
I n ,y''
,Sfr,,lravir'
CLOSINGTHE WRIT PETITION
WITHOUT COSTS.
g
(9q
I
RRM Educational Society
Dr. Rev K. VK Rao
Union of India, Department of Higher Education
All India Council for Technical Education
The Regional Officer, AICTE
The State of Telangana
T. Vinod Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
