HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT…
The present writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32s6 ]
,il I
,i
HIGH COURTFORTHE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial OriginalJurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTHDAY OFSEPTETMBER TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRIJUSTICE C.V. BHASKARREDDY
WRIT PETITION NO:22396 0F 2015
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petitionunder Article226 of the Constitutionof lndia praying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavitfiled therewith'the High Courtmaybe oleased toissue appropriatq.Writ' Order or Direction particularly' a Writ of il;; 0"";;,"; *"ffifialted03.12.2013 in AA/160/2013 and rurther proceedingsincluding the proceedingsunder section 5-A' section 6 declaration dared 25.11.2014and further proceedings as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction' contraryto the provisionsof TheRightto Fair Compensation and Transparencyin Land Acquisition,Rehabilitation and ResettlementAct' 2013 as also the provisions of LandAcquisitionAct,1894 and consequentlyset asidethe same and further direct therespondentsnot to interfere with the peaceful possessionand enioyment of theproperties of the petitioners mentioned therein'
\
l.A. NO: 1 OF 20151WPMP. NO: 28906 0F 2015)
Petition under Section 151 CpC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to set aside the notice dated 03.122013 in AAt160t2013 and further proceedings including the proceedings under section S_A, section 6 declaration dated 25 11'2014 lssued by Sth respondent and further direct the respondents not to interfere with the peacefur possession and enjoyment of the properties of the petitioners mentioned therein, pending disposal of Wp No. /20.1 5.
Counsel for the petitioners: SRt J.VENKATESWARA REDDY Counset for the Respondent No.1: cp FOR Mtpieofvf N a URBAN DEV 9::=:!forthe RespondentNos.2 & 3: GC rOn nl'veruue uounset ror the Respondent Nos.4 & S: SRI M.A.K. MUKHEED, SC FOR GHMC
The Court made the following: ORDER
'l
-.{
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSI'ICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.22396 of 2015
ORDER:
When the matter was taken up for hearing on 77.09.2024,
there was no representation for the pctitioners and therefore, the
matter was directed to be listed today under the caption"For
Dismissal". Despite the matter being Iisted today under the caption for dismissal, there is no representation for the petitioners. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the case
prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in
the writ petition, shall stand closed
SD/-N. SRIHARI ASSISTANT R GI
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To
HIGH COURT
DATED:1 8109t2024
ORDER
WP.No.22396 of 2O1S
R 1H .4-
?
c-\ f,r'
0 I ,lflti Iu5 a,
(9/
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS.
6tt?
@
ultil7/,
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition be dismissed for non-prosecution in the absence of representation.
Whether pending miscellaneous applications in the writ petition shall stand closed.
Whether there are any costs to be awarded in the writ petition for non-prosecution.
4 provisions across 4 enactments
LYfJalX[3',f,3bl6
T. Nirmala
State of Telangana
Secretary, Revenue Department
Dist Collector
Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
C.V. BHASKARREDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
