Peddaveni Yamuna v. Sri. Anurag Jayanthi
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petition alleging violation of a High Court order in land acquisition proceedings closed. The Court found the bypass road completed and compensation process initiated, rejecting wilful disobedience.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed with no costs awarded to any party.
What the court decided
I :
[32e6 ]
IN THE HIGHCOURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 758 OF 2024
Contempt Case filed Under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents herein for wilfu y and disobeying/deliberatelyiviolating the Orders of the High Court datd 16t10t2123 passed in W.p.No.29381of 2022. Between:
- leddayeli Yamuna, D/o. P.Komuraiah, Aged about 26 years, Occ. Advocate, Rl/o. H.NO.2-43, Ragudu Vi age, Sirci a Mandat, Rajanna Siici a District.
- Peddaveni p.ryqOna D/o. P. tvlattesham, Aged about 31 years, Occ. Agriculture, H.No. 2-43, Ragudu Viltage, Sircilta Mandal, Rajdnna'sircilli District.
...CONTEMPT PETITIONER/PETITONER
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the allegations of wilful disobedience of Court orders justify contempt proceedings against the respondents.
Whether the land acquisition proceedings were completed to vindicate the Court order.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
LEDDAYELI YAMUNA NE:C PEDDAVENI PRIYON
- respondent
SRI. ANURAG JAYANTHI NE:C OTHERS
Coram
C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/758/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court