The High Court closed Writ Petition No. 22 of 2014 concerning penal charges without costs, as the petitioner relied on an existing interim order.
Writ petition closed without order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions stood closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
t32521
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
WRIT PETITION NO:22 OF 2014
Between:
It//s. Srini Pharmaceuticals Limited, Plot No. 10, Type-C, Road No.8, Film Nagar, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad-SOO 033 Rep. by its Managing. Director, Shri. Dr. T.C. Reddy, (Service No. NLG - 344)
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Nticle 226 of the Constitutron of lndra praying that in the circumstNnces stated in the affidavit filed therewrth the High Court may be pleased to issue an Order, .direction or a Writ or more particularly one in the natllre of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents rn not waiving 50% of the penal charges levied from October, 2012 to August 2013 on thepetitioner company during R&C rneasures imposed by the APERC. in lerms of the orders passed APERC as illegal, arbitrary and violative of petitioners rights guaranteed under Article 14 and 19(1Xg) of the Constitution oflndta
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 26 OF 2014)
Petition under Sectron 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to drrect the respondents 1 to 3 not to take any coercive steps against the petittoner company including drsconnection of power supply of its service connection No.NLG-344, pursuant to the demand of the ampugned penal charges, pending disposal of the writpetition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s. C.K.R. ASSOCIATION
Counsel forthe Respondents: SRI R. VINOD REDDY, S.C. FOR TSSPDCL
The Court made the following: ORDER
I I L t I I I I I i
HON'BLE MRS JUSTICESUREPALLI NANDA
WRIT PETITION No.22 OF 2014
ORDER:
Heard M/s. C.K.R. Associates, learnedcounsel appearing on behalf of thepetitioner, SriR. Vinod Reddy, learned Standing Counsel forTSSPDCL, appearing on behalf of respondentNos. 1 to3.
\
" ...to issue an order direction or a Writ ormore particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents innot waiving 50o/o of the penal charges leviedfrom October 2Ol2 to August, 2013 on thepetitioner company during R and C measuresimposed by the APERC in terms of the orderspassed APERCas illegal, arbitrary and violative ofpetitionersrights guaranteed under Afticles t4 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India andpass...".
t I
2
\ry 22 20t4
order as to costs.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Petition shall.atio stand closed. /
sD/- A. SRTNTVASA BEDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// / sEcroN drrrcen
To,
1 One CC to [t//s C K R ASSOCIATION [OPUC]
3 Two CD Copies
[,P LS c/4t
HIGH COURT
DATED:2011112024
\r
1 HE
(
'1.t
d zdBiii trz4 ,;.
*
:i,
ORDER
WP.No.22 of 2014
CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
€{"r.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
It//s. Srini Pharmaceuticals Limited
Central Power Distribution Company of Andhra Pradesh Ltd.
The Superintendent Engineer, Operation Circle
The Senior Accounts Officer, Operation Circle
SUREPALLI NANDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
