A writ petition filed under Article 226 praymg for registration of a complaint regarding threats and illegal surveillance was dismissed as infructuous because the petitioner's counsel submitted that the cause no longer survived for adjudication.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32e6 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 21328 OF 2023
Between:
Sneha Yariagadda, W/o Eswar Kumar Seelamsetti, Aged About 32 Years R|/o Flat 402 , Plol2441245 Dhanunjaya Residency, Prashanth Hills Colony, Near Keshavreddy Sweets, Serilingampalle Mandal Hyderabad-500008
..,PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondent No.3 in considering the Petitioners representation dated 02.08.2023 for registering the crime against the Respondents No.4 herein for their threatening thepetitioner asking unnatural sexual favours, extortion,defam ing personal character,keeping survelliance on petitioners and her family,leaving suspicious packages before petitioners house here in which is illegal, arbitrary in the interests ofjustice andpass such orders as deemed fit and proper in the circumstances tn the interests ofjustice.
Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s. INDRAJA, REp. FOR Dr. M/s. M.MAOHAVI LATHA
Counsel forthe Respondent No.1 to 3: AGp FOR HOME
Counsel forthe Respondent No.4: -
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKARREDDY
WRIT PE"TITIO No.21328 of2O23
ORDER:
Ms.lndraja, learned counsel representing Dr.M.Madhavi Latha, Ieqrned counsel for thi petitioner, would submit thatthe cause in the writ petition does not survive for furtheradjudication and it has become infructuous.
Miscellaneous Petitions i if any,pending in thiswrit pe tition
shall stand closed.
SD/- K. AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//
To,
SECTIO OFFICER
1 One CC to Dr. M/s. M.MADHAVI LATHA, Advocate tOpUCl 2 Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Tetangana at Hyderabad [OUT]
3 Two CD Copies BSR GJP
I I I I {
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0410112024
f 1 E L
o
(Y ..\ ,y
4
lu -,t* t
..<br>i,, {u
o
o $,
*
H c t{
ORDER
WP.No.21328 of 2023
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION
AS INFRUCTUOUS,
WITHOUT COSTS
@aP'* 6uu
1 issue framed by the court
Whether this court should issue a writ of mandamus directing registration of a FIR based on a petition later found to be infructuous.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sneha Yariagadda
State Of Telangana
Commissioner Of Police, Cyberabad
Station House Officer, Raidurgam
Shobha Shaurya Sirgam
C.V. Bhaskar Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
