Bairu Rama Devi v. The State of Telangana
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the non-registration of an FIR by the petitioner's son. The respondent submitted that an FIR was registered on the subsequent date. The court accepted this submission and closed the petition without further orders.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was held closed and disposed of without any order as to costs, as the grievance was found to have been redressed.
What the court decided
[32e6 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OFJANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYFOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICEC,V.BHASKARREDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 121 OF2024
Between:
Bairu Rama Devi, Wo. B-Ramulu,Age. 48 years, Occ. Sarpanch, R/o. H.No.B-20, VenkatadriTownship, Phase-l' Chowdariguda village, Ghatkesar Mandal,Medchal-Malkajgiri District.
...PETITIONER
AND
- 1 The State of Telangana,Rep., by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the failure of the police station to register a case against petitioners was arbitrary and illegal contrary to Apex Court guidelines.
Whether an interim order should be passed pending disposal of the main writ petition under Section 151 Cr.P.C.
Whether the grievance of non-registration of the FIR is finally redressed by the registration of Crime No. 16 of 2024.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Bairu Rama Devi
- respondent
State of Telangana
- respondent
Commissioner of Police, Rachakonda
- respondent
Station House Officer, Medipally Police Station
- respondent
Bandi Chandra Reddy
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/121/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court