Disposed

Dr.B.Ratan Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC1 Feb 2024WP/2469/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition filed against inaction by police authorities regarding a complaint lodged on 26.01.2024 which was closed as civil in nature. The Court did not issue a writ but directed the Station House Officer to furnish the closure report to the petitioner.

What did the court decide?

Respondent No.3 directed to furnish the copy of the closure report to the petitioner.

Dr.B.Ratan Reddy Vs The State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

[^32e6 I

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO i 2469 OF 2024

¶7

Between:

¶8

313??l?!..Xi'3t;.::r,r,,Ji:?pT:B;EfloJi^#f,,,81fl ii,il.tfi ffi : Medchal, Medchal Malkajgir

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

The State of Telanoana. Re.p.by its principal Secretary Department of Home, Secretariat, Hyderaiad.'

¶12

2 The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad District_

¶13

3 The Station House Officer, Medchal police Station, Medchal Malkajgiri District.

¶14

...RESPONDENTS

¶15

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of MANDAMUS declaring ttre inaction of the respondents 2 and 3 in not taking any action in pursuance of petitioner's written complaint dated 26-012024 submitted before ttre respondents in spite of acknowledging the sarne as arbitrary, illegal, c-apricious and violative of provisions of Cr.p.C as well as rigffis guaranteed under Articles 14, 19,21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondents to act upon the grievarrce of the petitioner's complaints dated 26-01-2024 for.thwith in accordance with law.

¶16

¶17

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶18

Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the respondents to take appropriate further action in pursuance of compraint dated 26-01-2024 fired by the petitioner, pending disposar of the above writ petition.

¶19

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MALLA REDDY SANKATT

¶20

Counsel for the Respondents: AGp FOR HOME

¶21

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶22

, I

¶23

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.^{BHASI(AR REDDY}

¶24

UIRIT PETITION No.2469 of 2o24

¶25

ORDER:

¶26

The present writ^petition is filed^praying this^Courtto declare the^{actionof respondent Nos.2 and 3 in not taking any} action in^{pursuanceof the petitioner'swritten complaint dated} 26.01 .2024 as^{illegal, arbitrary, unjust,contraryto law and} against^{the principlesof natural justice.}

¶27

The case of the^petitioner is that he^{lodged a written} complainant^{dated' 26.OL.2O24 bfore respondentNo.3. The} grievance of the^petitioner is^{that evenafterreceivingthe said} complaint^{respondentNo.3 is not registering the case.}

¶28

[rarned Assistant Government^{Pleader forHome} appearing for^{respondent Nos.1 to 3, on instructions,would} submit that^acting on^{the complaint,dated 26.01.2024} submitted by^{the petitioner, the Police conducted preliminary} enquiry and^{it is revealedthat there are civil disputespending} between the^{petitioner with third pa.rtie s and as such,they} closed the said^{complaint as 'civil in nature'.}

¶29

karned counsel appearing^{for thepetitionerhas} submitted^{that so far the petitioner has not receivedany closure}

¶30

¶31

CVBR, J Wp_2469 _2O24

¶32

report and if the copy of the closure report is furnished he will take appropriate steps by approaching the competent forum.

¶33

5 In view of the said submissions, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition directing respondent No.3 to furnish the copy of the closure report to the petitioner to enable him to take appropriate steps as available under law.

¶34

6 With the above observations, the Writ petition is disposed of. No costs

¶35

7 As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶36

SD/. P.Ch. NAGABHUSHAMBA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶37

//TRUE COPY//

¶38

SECTION OFFICER

¶39

To, 1 The Station House Officer, Medchat police Station, Medchal Malkajgiri District.

¶40

2 Qne QC^{to Sri Matta Reddy Sankati,} Advocate tOpUCl 3 .lwo^CCst9 _GP_for^{Home, HighCourt for the Stite} of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUTI 4. Two CD Copies TJ GJP 4

¶41

¶42

/ t

HIGH COURT

DATED:01 t02t2024

ORDER

1 $E STA I e'
'Jc
oU z 3 ltlAR 202[ zo
*
DeSPATC\ r€.9

¶47

WP.No.24G9 of 2024

¶48

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION wirHour cosrs. @w* \

Dr.B.Ratan Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr.B.Ratan Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohd. Abdul Muqeem Vs State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary

Todday Tappers Co-Operative Society(Ttcs) Vs The State of Telangana

Vorugant Santhosh Vs The State of Telangana

Musipetla Sreedhar Goud Vs The State of Telangana

Shri.Gone Jagadishwar Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

M/s. Sai Construction Corporation Vs State of Telangana