Writ petition sought electricity service connection to the petitioner's premises and a NOC from the Housing Board. Counsel represented that the cause no longer survived; the court dismissed the petition as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32521
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEIV1BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 19370 OF 2015
Between:
Vikas Mahila Mandali, rep by its Secretary K.Lakshmi Devi Wo K.Nagaraju, aged about 62 years, Rio H.No.281lC, Sanjeeva Reddy Nagar, Hyderabad500 038.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or direction declaring the action of the 1st respondent in notproviding electricity service connection to thepetitioner premises situated at Sanjeeva Reddy Nagar as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to issue NOC for electricity service Connection and further direct the 1st respondent toprovide electricity service connection to thepetitionerpremises.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 25044 OF 2015)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to direct the 1st respondent to provide electricity service connection to thepremises of petitioner Mandali situated at Sanjeeva Reddy Nagar without insisting NOC
from 2nd respondent or alternatively direct the 2nd respondent to issue NOC for electricity service connection pending disposal of the above Writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.GANGA RAMI REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI R.VINOD REDDY, SC FOR TSSPDCL
Counsel for the Resoondent No.2: SRI BUCHI BABU, SC FOR TSHB
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
IURIT PETITION No.19370 of 2O15
ORDER:
It is represented by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that the cause of action in the present writ petition does not survive for adjudication, any more.
Petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, there
shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any,pending
:
l
in the Writ Petition shall also stand closed..
SD/-N.SR|HAR| ASSISTANT EGIST
//TRUE COPY//
SE ON OFFICER
To,
BsR y
KKS
1
HIGH COURT
DATED: 19101t12024
ORDER
IHE SI4 14:
(
o
14 rEB 2[25
.<br>\o
l.u9
WP.No.1937tt of 2015
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS,
WITHOUT COSTS
I
/ n
tN
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vikas Mahila Mandali, rep by its Secretary K. Lakshmi Devi
The Southern Power Distribution Company of T.S. Limited, Operation Circle, City North, Hyderabad
Telangana State Housing Board, rep by its Vice Chairman and Managing Director
Surepalli Nanda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
