The writ petition was closed following the respondents' submission that they had complied with interim directions to dispose of the petitioner's representation and legal notice. No costs were imposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 259'18 OF 2015
Between:
Palepu Hanumantha Rao S/o. Ramaiah,, aged About 25years, Occ unemployee, r/o. Balapet, Thallada Mandal, KhammamDistrict.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled therewith,the High Court maybe pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction, more in thenature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondentsin not consideringthe representation dated 15.9.2014 and thelegal noticedated 30-1 .2015 and not paying the compensation while keeping up thepromise given beforethe Vilalgers on the sadful date of death of thepetitioenrs father on 30.8.2012 evenafterlapse of almost 3 years as being illegal, arbitraryand is in violation of principles of promissory estoppel apart from being in violation of Article 21 of the constitutionof lndia and consequently direct therespondents to consider and pay the compensation whileproviding the employmentto any one of the family member of the petitioner.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WP MP. NO:33652 OF 2015)
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to direct the respondents to consider and dispose of the representation dated 15.9.2014 and the legal notice dated 30..2015 forthwith and report compliance to this Honourable Court, pending disposal of the above writpetition andpass such other order or orders may deem fit andproper in the circumstances of the case.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. K RATHANGA PANI REDDY
Counsel for the Respondents: SRl. R VINOD KUMAR REDDY
The Court made the following: ORDER.
/)
/. /
HON'BLE MRS JUSTICESUREPALLI NANDA
WRIT PETITION No.25918OF 2O1s
ORDER:
Heard Sri K.RathangapaniReddy, learned counsel appearing on behalfof the petitioner and Sri R'Vinod Reddy, learned StandingCounsel forTSSPDCL, appearing on behalfof respondentNos.1to 4'
\ \
to issue an appropriateWrit, order or direction, more in the nature ofWrit of Mandamus,declaring the action of therespondentsinnot considering the representation dated15'09.2014and the legal notice dated 30.01.2015 andnot paYing the compensation while keepinq upthe promise given before the Villagers on the sadfuldate of death of the petitioner'sfather on 30.08.20 12 evenafterlapse of almost 3 yearsas being itlegal, arbitrary andis in violation of principles of pri^ittory estoppel apartfrom being in violation of 'Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct therespondents toconsider and paythe compensation whileprovidingthe employment to any one of the famitYmember of the petitioner,and pass such other order ororders".
"There shalt beinterim direction tothe respondents todispose of the representationdated
l
15.09.2014 and the legat notice dated 30.01.2015, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order."
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.
To,
SD/. N.SRIHARI ASSISTANT SEGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY// ' SECTION OFFICER
(n-
HIGH COURT
DATED:1910912024
ORDER
I rtts SfA
,(-
t .)ta
+
J 6(
o z
1 / 0E[ Z0Z{
.r<br>t t
P TctleC
WP.No.25918 of 2015
CLOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION
WITHOUT COSTS ?* t2-. )4 I 6cal-itz
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents were liable to pay compensation and provide employment to the petitioner's family member following the death of his father due to an incident involving the corporation?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Palepu Hanumantha Rao
The Telangana Transmission Corporation
The Superintending Engineer, Telangana Transmission Corporation
The Deputy Executive Engineer, Telangana Transmission Corporation
The Assistant Engineer, Telangana Transmission Corporation
SUREPALLI NANDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
