Writ petition sought action against a school alleged to be running CBSE classes without recognition and collecting fees. As the petitioner's daughter had withdrawn from the school and a related writ petition was pending, the court closed the petition without costs, leaving the validity of the school's permission to the pending writ.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32e6 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEI/BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 18460 OF 2023
Between:
Puli tr/ahesh, S/o. tVlallesh, Aged about 37 years, Occ Pvt. Employee R/o. H.No.8-2-44l1 , Vinoba Nagar Godavarikhani, Ramagundam Peddapalli District. T. S.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of |he Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent Nos.1 to 6 in failing to initiate action against Respondent No. 7's school on the representation of the petitioner dt. 02. 05. 2022 for misleading thepetitioner and general public in running the institution under the false impression of having CBSE recognition and without anypermissions and causinghardshipand
financial loss in collecting huge monies from thepetitioner for his daughters study as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional andagainstthe provisionsof Educational Act and consequently direct theRespondent Nos.1 to 6 to forthwith initiate necessary action asper rules underEducational Act against the 7th respondent for having beenrunning theinstitutionwithout havingany permissions, approvals and recognition for conducting CBSE syllabus andto close down the institution till the norms under therules are complied with.
lA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to direct the Respondent Nos- 2 to 5 to forthwithinitiate action by conducting enquiry as per the proceedings of the 3rd respondent in Rc. No. 121018212023, dt. 13.06.2023 by duly considering the representation/complaint of thepetitioner dt. 02.05.2022, pending disposal of the above writpetition.
lA NO: 2 OF 2023
Between:
...PETITIONER
AND
Respondents No.2 & 3 are not necessary parties to this petition
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under section r 51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to vacate the lnterim direction dated 21 .07.2023 passed in w.p. No. 18460 of 2023.
IANO: 3OF2 023
Between:
R.ao's School, NTpC. Annapurna colony Godavari Khani, Ramaoundam Ma ndatpeddapali D_istricr, n'ep oy Frin.ipr-i3*il kr;;ti' Sr;;ii;"t, il/i; Gandhi, Aged 35 years.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to vacate the order Dt 2110712023 passed in Wp No 18460 of 2023.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI C.HARI PREETH Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 6: Gp FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION Counsel for the Respondent No.7: SRI pERl PRABHAKAR I he court made the following: ORDER
/ // a'\
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C. V. BHASK.A.R REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.l 8460 of 2o23
ORDER:
This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is frled by the petitioner seeking the following reliet
"....To issue on oppropriote Writ, Order or Direction more porticulorly one in the nature ol Writ of Mondamus, declorinq the oction of the Respondent Nos. 1to 6 in loiling to initiote oction ogainst the school of Respondent No. 7 school on the representation of the petitioner, doted 02.05.2022 for misleoding the petitionet ond generol public in running the institution under the Iolse impression of hoving CBSE recognition ond without ony permissions ond cousing hardship ond financiol loss in collecting huge monies t'rom the petitioner for his doughters study os illegol, orbitrory, unconstitutionol ond agoinst the provisions of Educotionol Act ond consequentty direct the Respondent Nos. 7 to 6 to lorthwith initiote necessory oction os per rules under Educdtiondl Act agoinst the 7th respondent Ior hoving been running the institution without hoving ony permissions opprovols ond recognition for conducting cBsE syllabus ond to close down the institution t r the norms unde( the rules ore complied with and to poss...,'
2
the competent authorities under the provisions of the Telangana Education Act, 1982, he has submitted number of representationsI to the respondent authorities seeking to cancel the affiliation/ recognition of respondent No.7 and also take appropriate action in accordance wittr law.
3
SD/.MOHD. ISMAIL ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// srcrrolt*ircen
/
To,
HIGH COURT
DATED: 2410912024
ORDER
WP.No.18460 of 2023
CLOSING THE WRITPETITION, WITHOUT COSTS
ff^Ue - ,),r)r4
a HE S14
14 o
,.'::.
)
()
,,)
2 7 [ic 2021
D
C
1 issue framed by the court
Whether respondents 1-6 should be directed to act against respondent 7 school allegedly run without CBSE recognition or permissions under the Telangana Education Act, 1982.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Puli Mahesh
The State of Telangana
The Commissioner and Director of School Education
The Regional Joint Director, School Education Department, Warangal
The District Collector, Peddapalli
Rao's School, NTPC, Godavarikhani (rep. by Principal Smt. Kandhi Saadhana)
C.V. Bhaskar Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
