Dismissed
Soyam Thirupathi v. The District Collector
Telangana HCWP/18410/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAYOF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 18410 OF 2009
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of wnt
of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondentsin seekingto disposessthe petitioners from th,:ir land and demolish remove the houses/huts raised by the petitioners therein lhe land in Sy No 817 of Palvancha(V)(Lakshmi Devi PalliH/o. Somulagudem) anc Mandal, Khammam Districtwithout any notice of followingdue process of natural tustice and arl 14,21 and 300-4 of the constitution of lndia and A.P Schedule Are:ts Land Transer Requisition1959 as amendedby regulation 111970 and consequently direct the respondenlsto enquireand survey the above said land as per the lands assigned bypatta Certificatedt 05-1 1-1968 andto protect the same
l.A. NO:'l OF 2009 WPMP. NO: 24093 OF 2009
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying thatin the circumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Courtmaybe pleased direct the respondents tc, demolish remove thehouses/huts raised by the petitioners therein the land in Sy No 817 of Palvancha(V)(Lakshmi Devi Palli H/o. Somulagudem) anc Mandal, Khammam Districtpending disposal of the above wp
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRl. P PRABHAKARRAO
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
.jr
rl
THE HONOURABLESRTJUSTICEK'SARATH WRIT PETTTION No. 18410 of2o,o9
ORDER:
Thispetition is coming for hearing since 2009' On 22.11.2024,when the matter was called' there was no representation,therefore,the matter was directed to be Iisted underthe caption "for Dismissal"'Eventoday' when the matteris called, there is no representation'It seems that thepetitionersare not interested to prosecute, this
CASC
2 Accordingty,the Writ Petitionis dismissedfolnon- prosecution/default'No order as to costs'
\
Writ Petitionshall also standclosed.
SD/.V.KAVITHA ASS STAN T REGISTRAR ,/TRUECOPY// CTIONOFFICER
'O,,, . ON" CC tO SRI.P PRABHAKAR RAO AdVOCAtE [OPUC]
e Two CDCopies KKS GJP
?-.c,
,
HIGH COURT
DATED:1311212024
ORDER
WP.No.18410 of 2009
HE sAr e,
(
).(:
,,}
tA 0 1 riifl 2[25 za
>l
i .,r0 ./,1|| ..it
-.--i-_ _r-:--
E!-.
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON.PROSECUTION WITHOUT GOSTS
QF(, \il"f \e
Soyam Thirupathi and 8 Others
The District Collector, Khammam District
Revenue Divisional Officer, Palvancha
Tahsildar Palvancha
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court