Varalakshmi Industries, v. The State of Telangana
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Telangana disposed of a writ petition challenging the seizure of petitioner stocks and records, holding that the cause of action ceased as the Principal Sessions Judge had allowed the related criminal appeal, thus no further orders were required.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition closed with no order as to costs and related civil petition closed without orders.
What the court decided
H]GH COURT FOR THE SJIIE.OF- TELANGANA AT - ' HYoERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)-
THURSDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND rWrr.rrY FOUN
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 16559 oF 2016
Between:
its Proprietor D.No.12-112, Hfl f, [iill'ffJIff ,:,"tif ffi :flq"ffiT,pr..,,iI;r",fi
AND
...PETIT]ONER
- The State of Telangana, Represented by its principal Secretary, Food and consumer affairs, secretariat buihlngi, fi y;;;;6;;
- The District Collector (Civil Supplies),, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District.
- The Revenue Divisional officer, Karimnagar,, Karimnagar District.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking declaration of seizure illegal requires further orders in light of a separate Criminal Appeal disposed favorably by the Principal Sessions Judge.
Whether to pass any further orders regarding the seizure of stocks and records.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Its Proprietor D.No.12-112
- respondent
The State of Telangana
- respondent
The District Collector
- respondent
The Revenue Divisional Officer
- respondent
The Tahsildhar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/16559/2016
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court