The High Court dismissed itself a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking direction against unauthorized construction. The petition was dismissed due to the non-appearance and failure to prosecute by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION O: 1135 OF 2013
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of l,landamus, declaring the inaction of the respondent no. 3, 4 and 5 in restraining the respondent no.5 from constructing compound wall
{
unauthorizedly in survey no. 636 of Dharmapuri Village and Mandal, which belongs to the petitioner herein as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and violates article 14, 16 and 300A of Constitution of lndia and principles of natural justice consequently direct the respondents to forthwith initiate appropriate action against illegal and unauthorized construction i.e under taken by the respondent no. 6 herein, restraining from further construction and also further direct to demolish the construction i-e already raised by the respondent no.6.
l.A. NO: 1OF 2013{wPMP. NO: 1373 OF 2013)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent no.3,4 & 5 to restrain from further construction by the respondent no.6 and also direct the respondent to demolish the unauthorized construction in survey no- 636 of Dharmapuri Village and Mandal pending disposal of main Writ Petition
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI KIRAN KUMAR VADLAMUDI
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 3: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT
Counsel for the Respondent No.s: cP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI P. KISHORE RAO,
SC FOR GRAM PANCHAYAT
Counsel for the Respondent No.6;---
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
W.P.No.1135 of 2O13
OR-DER:
When the matter came up for hearing on 14.12.2023 there was no representation for the petitioners, therefore the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption 'for dismissal". In spite of it, today also there is no representation for the petitioners. Therefore, this Court has no option except to dismiss the writ petition for nonprosecution/ default.
petition, shall stand dismissed.
sD/- v. ITHA ASSISTANTREGITRAR
/ITRUE COPY//
SECTIONO ICER
TJ
6
HIGH COURT
SK J
DATED:04/0112024
ORDER
WP.No.1135 of 2013
1ri 'C STA}A
aA
od 0 7 r r'J 2021 >az
*
i
pL
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON-PROSECUTTOru/Dsrnur- r, WITHOUT COSTS.I
I C,Tl
W
Gatla Janamma
Gatla Srinivas
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Department of Panchayathraj
The District Panchayath Officer Karimnagar District
The Panchyat Secretary, Grampanchayath, Dharmapuri
The District Collector, Karimnagar District
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
