A borrower challenged an APSFC auction notice to the extent of one scheduled item as illegal, arbitrary and violative of natural justice. Counsel for the petitioner stated the notice was valid only for 90 days, so the cause did not survive; the writ petition was closed without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
132521
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA .AT HYDERABAD
(Speciat Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 12071 oF 2016
Between:
M/s Sri Uma Maheshwara. paper -p^vtLtd., A privateLimitedcompany inclrrporared Under the provisioris of compariies nct, lss6 Hivlio iti'drii"" at D.No 17-1-3B3\N4Z, ilt Ftoor, Vinay Nagjar Cotonv,'SriOiO;;:'ii'r,i;;;A _ Ig005er Repby_its Director sriil. Dayan-and Reddys/o. M. erii6ii;iilo or years, ucc Bustness, Rl/o. D.No 17_1_3831N43, lll Floor, Vinay.Na"gar Colony, Saidabad, Hyderabad - 500 059
...PET|T|ONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ot the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus by decraring the impugned auction notice dt- 24-02-2016 issued by the respondent No 3 to the extent of item No i.l is illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles 1a, 19(ixg) and 21 of the constitution of lndia, besides violative of Principles of Natural Justice and contrary to the provisions of A.P.State Financial corporation Act, 19s1 and consequenfly selaside the same
7
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 15142OF 20161
Petition under Section'l 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the auction notice dt: 2402-2016 issued by the respondent No 3 to the extent of item No 11, pending disposal of the Writ Petition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. B. CHANDRASEN REDDY
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI R. RAJENDRA PRASAD
The Court made the following: ORDER
*7
HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
WRIT PETITION n.l2o71 ol 2OL6
ORDER:
Heard Sri B. Chandrasen Reddy, learned counsel appearing on behalf ol the petitioner and Sri R. Rajendra Prasad, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents.
2 The oetitio er aooroached the Courtseekino praver as under:
\ \
il t
2
).
\r_l
<br>
the present writ petition does not survive for adjudication, any more.
order as to costs.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions , if any, pending
in the Writ Petition shall also stand closed.
I
I
//TRUE COPY//
SD/.T. JAYASREE ASSISTAN REG
SE N OFFICER
To,
1 One CC toSRl.B. CHANDRASEN REDDY'AdvocatglO.P]JCI 2. 5;; d6 i"sni. n" nniErl-onn pnesnD, Advocate[oPUc] 3. Two CD CoPies
BM BS
?r
HIGH COURT
DATED:1411112024
ORDER
STAT E oA
a. $11 ,a
tt l*t
oo ,t
,
I oF.s-r aIc
WP.No.12071 ot 2016
CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUTCOSTS
I /,' >11
7
Tcry-ry
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the auction notice dated 24.02.2016 to the extent of item No.11 was illegal and liable to be set aside
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s Sri Uma Maheshwara Papers Pvt. Ltd., rep. by its Director Sri M. Dayanand Reddy
The Andhra Pradesh State Financial Corporation
The General Manager (Projects), Andhra Pradesh State Financial Corporation
The Senior Manager (VFQ-TQ), APSFC
Surepalli Nanda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
