In this second appeal, the appellant's counsel reported that legal representatives of the deceased appellant were not showing interest to proceed. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the appeal as abated.
The Second Appeal is dismissed as abated; order would lie to costs; pending miscellaneous applications stand closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
.. ":1.:,_-.,,..' :-,r?llr, l il SXf;Ilil [3215]r ''?Yi..aa
IN THE HIGH COURTFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTYFOURTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYFOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLEDR. JUSTICEG.RADHARANI
s ECOND APPEAL NO:77 OF2011
Appeal under section 100 of CPCagainst JudgmentandDecreedated1'' 27.12.2010 made in A.s.No.34 0f 2003 0n the file of the courtof the seniorcivili',. Judge, Peddapallipreferred against the judgmentand decreedated 26.09-2003 in O.S.trto. 179 of 2oO2 on the file ofthe Court of the JuniorCivilJudge, Godhavarikhani.
Between:
Chinnala Chandraiah S/o Mallaiah,aged 60 years, Occ: Agriculture,Fl/o.1, Jangallapalli H/o Medipalli Village,Ramigundamlvlandal, KarimnagarDistrict ':1
...APPELLANT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF
AND
':
..RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
SAMP. NO: 197 OF 2011
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay " all further proceedings in OS.No. 179 of 2OO2 on the file of the Junior Civil,.' Judge, Godavarikhani, as confirmed in AS.No.34 of 2003 on the file of the Senior'. Civil Judge, Peddapalli.
Counsel for the Appellant: SRl. G. MADHUSUDHAN REODY
Counsel for the Respondents: SRl. N. HARI PRASAD
The Court delivered the following JUDGMENT:
iri,rl* al '1+l 4tdt*i"
. .::':trati:.!.,- ' ra.:-524"r''
THE HONOURABLEDR..IUSTICEG. RADHA RANI
SECOND APPEAL No.77 of 20ll
JUDGMtrNT:
lhis appeal is tlled by theappeltant aggrievedby the judgment and decree dated27 .l2.2OlOpassedin A.S.No.34 o12003 by the Senior Civit Judge, peddapalli. confirming rhe judgment and decree dated 26.09.2003 passedin O.S.No. ll9 of 2022by the JuniorCivilJudge, Godhavarikhani'
\r.r ordct' lls to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applicationspendingin this appeal if any shall
stand closed.
-'-*SA:K. SHYLESHI
DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
G
SECTION OFFICER
To,
'i:
VH
N_"-
HIGH COURT
DATED: 2410112024
JUDGMENT
SA.No.77 of 2011
: ,, .&l-, ..
, :., .5 "L .;,,r;-
:, i-,i-,*;::;;
i?q q
''
'!'. :,,
L:
!&.-.
:
i$
1rr 6 5T416
e I
10 APB zut (i
o,y
.j)
Og5 r,,r-1C<br>I
ffi
\f
DISMISSING THE
SECOND APPEAL
AS ABATED
@5,
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second appeal stands dismissed on the ground of abatement due to lack of interest by legal representatives.
Chinnala Chandraiah
Chinnala Kistaiah
Chinnala Sathaiah
G. Radharani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
