Dismissed

The New India Assurance Comnpany Limited, Mumbai v. Billa Devakka and 8 Others

Telangana HC24 Jan 2024MACMA/3624/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Insurance company appealed a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal compensation award but withdrew the appeal before the Lok Adalat. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn and the Tribunal's judgment was confirmed.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; Tribunal decree confirmed; unpaid compensation to be deposited within one month with interest; court fee refunded.

The New India Assurance Comnpany Limited, Mumbai Vs… — Motor Accident Claims | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY TWo THoUSAND AND TWENTy eouC^"

¶3

:PRESENT:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI

¶5

MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL Mtsc ELLAN EOUS APPEAL NO: 3624 0F 2008

¶6

Appeal under Section J73 bf Motor Vehicres Act against the orderand Decree made in o'p'No.61g or 2002 aateo or.ri.zoos 0n tn" fire of the court of ttre Motor Accident ctaims rribr"ai (f;;Iioi' "rr,nncl irr_o[iru .l-ras", il,n#::

¶7

Between:

¶8

#ir,I;:l.,i1flx..1'd$,'?[T*??Tlpj;]il,.#y1";.,,Hoteryosirnrernationar

¶9

AND

¶10

AppellanURespondent No.3

¶11

' f,'Haff'ffE6"wo"Guravaiah^{House hold Ri/o Yelaram virage, Luxeftipet}

¶12

D/o Guravaiah House hold R/o Yellaram Village, Lrrxettipet

¶13

' [:T;"ixi,[i

¶14

, f5llli"?nffini, D/o Guravaiah R/o yeilaram Vifiase, Luxettipet Mandar,

¶15

a' (rflr.. sandhya Rani, D/o Guravaiah R/o yeraram Mravllrq g eE , r_u^srr.rpLuxeftip e rt Man dar,oa Adilabad Disi.

¶16

R3 & R4 declared as.Major 1!q Rl discharged from guardianship Vide courtorderDri4.os.2ooiilc'rilp'iizCiiitdgl-

¶17

Billa Tirumalesh. S/o Guravaiah pet. 2 to 5 are minors , rep by their mother _ pet. No. 1 Rr/o ye ita ram Mlragil L Jx.,iiipe'irri"t""i, no il" uad D isr.

¶18

6 .Bjll:,!i"gq,."-!, g&. Bakkaiah Asricutrure o. ,"r".r-;:;* Luxettipet Mandal, Aditabad Dist.

¶19

,t f,,giry;ii1i]*o$r& .,rnaiah Agricutture R/o yenaram Vilase, Luxetrpet

¶20

Abdul Majid Khan, s/o not kno-lvn, age adult Business and ist owenr of rATA sumo no. MH-01-u-4ss4 ruo rorioi"puioi:nJJp-drrirr,ranoar, Aoiriili oiiiiti]

¶21

I 5fl rySl'li,Tl,?Sm,:,,"r:i,f$:,f L,o",o#?,"ioll3jf

¶22

Respondent

¶23

IA NO: 2oF 2009

¶24

petition ,nd:l :-"_"!igl 15.J CpC prayjng rhat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support ot ttre peiitiJnlin" Higt Courl may be pteased to permit the petitioners 3 and 4'to ritil;ilih; ;mpensation, in proportion to the

¶25

extenr of their share ^|y. dg,fy6-iir"'-"?j.1 ot. 01.08.2006 made in MACMAMpNo.3637 0f iooo.in_r,rad',nie10.ii6z+"oTzoo8, pending disposar of the appear'^pendins disposar ot ue,vrAr6l;-;6?ri,;, the fire of the Hish courr.

¶26

IA NO:2OF 2006

¶27

petition ,"t: _q!l 1s.l cpc praying that in the circumsrances stated in the affidavit filed in support of tne petltiJnl J?,,tz,s[']ii:rm.sulfi.]l'*:i#'tl..t,#:jd{'I#?iT""t# Adilabad, Pending ui"p.r Bfi|[t#' "I^{iletii,risozaor 2008, on the fire or the}

¶28

g8?:tfriLfliffi r,,ffi iiixi:t,ETffi ,':i jfl;,i,];,y,3:I_"f,::,"1115 eo,o&-t"ro,in"*;"ffi;:.,3$,ilt"^1,8il89,t",.H,ffi rli"{"r""rexiili" jarur,

¶29

The court made the following Judgment:

¶30

¶31

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE^{G. ITADHARANI}

I I i

l i

M.A.C .IVI.A. N o.3624^{ol' 2008}

¶37

¶38

JUDGMENT:

¶39

This appeal is filed^{by the appellant} -^{Insttrance Company aggrieved by} the award and decree^{dated 01.12.2005passed in o.P.No.6li; of 2002 by the} Chairman, Motor^{Accident Claims liibunal(for short"MAC1-')} -^{cum -}

¶40

District Judge. Adilabad.

¶41

The matter u,as referred^{to l-ok Adalar pu|stlarlt to the letter rjatetl} 23.12.2023 acldressed^{by the Secretary, High Court Legal Se|vices Cotrrmittee,} I{yderabad. An award^{waspassedby the Lok Adalat on 'i0.1?.2023andas per} the said award, the leamed^{counsel for the appeltantagteeclto withclraw'the} appeal.

¶42

Hence, the appeal is disposed^{of in terms of'the Au,ard<iated 30.12.2023} passed by the Lok Adalat.^{No order as to costs.}

¶43

Miscellaneous applications^{pending, if any, shallstandclosed'}

¶44

SD'- P CH NAGABHUS ASSISTANT REGIS

¶45

,,TRUE COPY/'

¶46

SECTTON OFFICER

¶47

To, 1. The Chairman,^{MotorAccident claims Tribunal4um-DistrictJudge, Adilabad.} (with records if anY)

¶48

bne CC to SRI^{I MAAMU VANI, Advocate} [OPUC]

¶49

One CC to SRI S^{V MUNI REDDY, Advocate} [OPUC]

¶50

Two CD CoPies. s.IR-^x. Cant GqyLU"an^{Gm'l+{e/ ft} hoo,rf, tor^ra

¶51

JA stb + ItJe^"LJ.-

¶52

b Along with a copy of Lok Aclalat^Award.

/ I j

HIGH COURT

DATED:2 4tO1t2O24

JUDGIIIENT

IIIACMA.N o5624of 2008

¶58

r oR THE ,st
o)
i
a
ot My e4
,7)
i:,
'.,,3.r.,-t
'- .trc+lE+
-:+it._r;.:jr i/

¶59

ifiiff 'Xf'BB Xl.'#t".[i ,i,iiT+' o F rH E @*'etu

¶60

¶61

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COi/tlllTTEE FOR THE,STATE OF TELANGANA,^HYDERABAD.

¶62

[Under^{Sectionl9 of lhe LegqlServlcesAdhodlbs Act,I 987 (CenkolAcol}

¶63

toQ

¶64

Date:30-12-2023

¶65

vrcE.s
q
r.l
ofo +
I
d.
Itre Slate
ji;

¶66

Present: 1 . Hon'ble Justice Sri J.Sreenivas Rao, (Judge Hlgh Court foc the StrtE of Telang.na) chairman

¶67

Sri N.Pararneswar Reddy, Advocate, Member

¶68

Sri Srinivasa Srikanth, Advocate Member

¶69

MACMA:No.3624 0f 2@8

¶70

(Before the Fbn'ble High Court)

¶71

AGAINST

¶72

Ori nal Petition No.61 2 (On the fite of the Chairman, Motor Acgident C s Tribunal - Cum^- District Judge, Aditabad)

¶73

Between:

¶74

The.New lndia Asurance Company Limited, HoteI Yogi lnternationaI Building, 1st Ftoor, 166, CST Road, Katina, Mumbai.

¶75

...Appeltant/Respondent No. 3

¶76

AND

¶77

Bitta Devakka W/o.Guravaiah, Aged about 33 years, Occ: Househotd,

¶78

Kum.Srivani D/o.Guruvaiah, Aged about 18 years, occ: Househotd,

¶79

Kum. Bhavani D/o. Guruvaiah, Aged about 23^years,

¶80

,i:

¶81

Kum.Sandhya Rani D/o. Guruvaiah, Aged about 20 Years,

¶82

(R3 and R4 declared as major and Rl dirhargeil from guardianship on shop virCe cou rt order dated. 1 4-09^-2009 in CMP. NO :47 28 1,2@9)

¶83

Bilta Tirumalesh S/o.Guiuvaiah, i . Aged about l0years, i.:

¶84

(Petitioner Nno.2 to 5 being minors represented by their mother Petitioner No.1)

¶85

Bilta Lingaiah S/o.Bakkaiah, Aged about 60 years, Occ: Agrkulture,

¶86

Bitta Venkawa W/o. Lingaiah, Aged about 55 years, Occ: Agricutture,

¶87

(Alt R/o.YeLtaram Vittage, Luxettipet Mandat, Aditabid District) . .^ :.... ...Respondents/ Pdtitioners

¶88

i.f-r-*

¶89

( (

¶90

Abdut Majid Khan S/o.Not Known Aged: Adutt, Business & lst Owner of TATA Sumo Bearing No.MH-01 -U-4954 C/o.AMK Garments, H.No.24-09, Jai Baba Nagar, i Behind Sansar Hotel, Dharavi. . ,

¶91

I
I
I
t

¶92

Kodipunjuta Lingaiah JS/o.Rajaiah, 2nd Owner of Offending vehicte MH-01^-aJ-4954, R/o.Kondapur,', Dandepatti Manda[, Adil.abad District.

¶93

...Respondent/ . . ! RespohdentNo.l&2 ., AWARD

¶94

'l . This is an appeat fited by the Appeiilffisurance Company chattenging the brier dated 01^-12-2005 passed in OP: No,6t d. of 2002 by the District Judge;,-Adjtabad.

¶95

¶96

1. Smt. A.Gayathri, /rlanager - The Authorized representative of Appetiant/lnsurance ' Company, has appeared and represented that the lnsurance Company decided not to pursue the present appeal and therefore they are withdrawing the appeat.

¶97

The said representation is r"ecorded and the appea[ is dismissed as withdrawn, confirming the^judgment and decree of the Court/Tribunal below. The amount, if any, remaining unpaid to ths ctaimant(s) shatl be deposited by the lnsurance Company within one month'from the date of receipt of the award, atong,.with interest.

¶98

On such deposit, the Respondent/Ctaimant(s) is/are permitted to withdraw his/her/their respective amount/s as per the award passed by the Tribunat/lvlACT.

¶99

ln case, the parties subsequentty come to know about fiting of cross appeal/cross objection, they are given tiberty to seek recatl of this Order/Awaid:

¶100

Court fee paid on this appeal shatt be refunded.

¶101

No costs.

¶102

tfiQ;r;h rrts+qflftfrLg
ForThe Ne.. 'rni3 A.s:;Uia.cr Co..Ltd.
@4-
, RftFr -ilfn .:ri*+-<r7lftH&
OULY C DT'i3 .IT,JTED ATTORNEY
Appdttant/Respondent No. 3
Insurance Com an
afrg. t ytue.O,),
CHAIRMAN MEMBER / MEMBER
e)
o- m
rs .T

The New India Assurance Comnpany Limited, Mumbai v. Billa Devakka and 8 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The New India Assurance Comnpany Limited, Mumbai v. Billa Devakka and 8 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs I.v.Ranga Rao and Another

Boora Prabhakar Vs Panthangi Dashratha

Etukuri Samba Siva Rao, Khammam Vs M. Harsavardhana and Anr, Khammam

The New India Assurance Company Limited, Vs Burugula Venkateshwar Reddy

The National Insurance Company Ltd., Vs Baba Sharaduddin , Sharfuddin and Another

Chinnala Chandraiah Vs Chinnala Kistaiah