Dismissed

The New India Assurance Company Limited, Hyderabad. v. Putta Nagamani and Another

Telangana HC23 Jan 2024MACMA/4388/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court, while hearing an appeal against a Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal award, disposed of the matter based on the appellant's withdrawal of the appeal at the Lok Adalat stage. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

appeal dismissed as withdrawn; confirmation of lower court judgment and decree; deposit of unpaid amount directed.

The New India Assurance Company Limited, Hyderabad… — Motor Accident Claims | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH^{COURT FOR THESTATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶2

TUESDAY,THE^{TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY} TWO THOUSAND^{ANDTWENTY FOUR}

¶3

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE^{DR. JUSTICE G.RADHARANI}

¶4

MOTOR ACCIDENT^{CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEALNo: 4388 OF 2012}

¶5

Appeal filed under^{Section'173 of M.V Act againstthe Orderand Decree} daled24.06.2005inO.P.No.5O6ot2OO2onthefileoftheChairman,MACT lPrincipal^{DistrictJ udgelNalgonda.}

¶6

Between:

¶7

The New lndia Assurance^{Company Limited, Rep. by its Divisional Manager'} Divisional Office,^{Himayathnagar, Hyderabad.}

¶8

...APPellanU2No ResPondent

¶9

AND

¶10

Putta Nagamani,^{WoPufta Janaiah, aged about25 years,HousewifeR/o} Kukkadail Village Vemulapalli^{Mandal,Nalgonda District'}

¶11

........ResPondenUPetitioner

¶12

Sri Sai Yuvajana Santham,^{rep. by B. Saidi Reddy,S/o PitchiR-eddy,} - nlb X*r"Udm Village Vemutipalii Mandal' Nalgdnda District, Owner of Auto No. AP-24 U-4926

¶13

...ResPondents/1"t ResPondent

¶14

l.A. NO: 2 OF^{2OOs(MACMAMP. NO:5271 0F} 0s)

¶15

Petition under Section^{151CPC praying that in the circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed^{in support of the petition,the HighCourt may be pleased} granting stay of operation of the decrere^{andjudgment in oP'no 506 of 2002 on} the file of the CHAIRMAN,^MACT, [PRL.^{DIST.JUDGEI NALGONDA DATED 24-} 6-05 pending disposal of^{the main CMA.}

¶16

Counsel for the Appellant:^{SRIA. RAMAKRISHNA REDDY}

¶17

Counsel for the Respondent^{No.1 : SRI VENKATREDDY THTPPARTHI}

¶18

The Court made the^{following:JUDGEMENT}

¶19

l I

¶20

¶21

THE HONOUITAI]LE^{DR.JUSTTCEG.RADHA RANI}

¶22

M.A.C.M.A^{.No.4388 of 2012}

¶23

JUDGMENT:

¶24

This appeal^{is filed by the appellantInsurance Cornpany aggrieved} by the award^{and decreedated24'06'2005 passcd in O P No 506 of 2002} by the Chairman,^{Motor Accidents Claims Tribunalcum PrincipalDistrict} Judge,^Nalgonda.

¶25

The matter^{was referredto Lok Adalatpursuant to the letter dated} 29.12.2023^{addressedby the Secretary'High CourtLegal Services} Committee,^{Hyderabad.An award waspassedby the Lok Adalaton} 30.12.2023^{and as per the said award,the learned counsellor the appellant} agreed to^{withdraw the aPPeal'}

¶26

Hence,^{the appeal is disposcd of in tcrrns ol the Award dated}

¶27

30.12.2023^{passed by the Lok Adalat No orderas to costs'}

¶28

Miscellaneous^aPPlications !9!d!ng, !{anY'^{thall stand closed}

¶29

Sd/- G.^SIREESHA ASSISTANT^REqISTRAR ,v,ITRUE^COPY// SECTION^OFFICER

¶30

¶31

To,

¶32

The Chairman,^{MACT[Principal DistrictJudge] Nalgonda'}

¶33

Z. On"^{CC to SRl. A RAMAKRISHNA REDDYAdvocate [OPUC]}

¶34

One^{CCtO SRI. VENKATREDDY THIPPARTHI AdVOCAICTOPUC]}

¶35

Two CD Co^pies RVR,/PT

¶36

HIGH COURT DATED:2310112024

¶37

JUDGMENT MACMA.No.4388 of 2012

¶38

\ HE SIA
f{ 'c
( o
q
c) 0 I APB 2020
C)
t D5 sPAtcH 9O *

¶39

DISPOSING THE MACMA

¶40

IN TERMS OF LOK ADALAT

¶41

AWARD

¶42

C
c

¶43

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD.

¶44

[Under^{SectionI I of} the Legot Services Authorilies Act, 19gZ (Centrot Act)l

¶45

Date: 30-12-2023

¶46

Present: 1. Hon'ble Justice Sri J.Sreenivas Rao, (lud9e H'gh Coort for the State of Telangana)

¶47

Chairmin

¶48

gERV'C€g
2. Sri N.parameswar Sri N.parameswar N.parameswar Reddy, Advocate,
Member
3. Sri Srinivasa Srikanth, Advocate
Member
ooJq
t
lvlAClviA.No.43 88 of 2012
I
tteStetc (Before the Hon,ble High Court)Hon,ble High Court)High Court)Court)

¶49

Sri N.parameswar Sri N.parameswar N.parameswar Reddy, Advocate, Member

¶50

(Before the Hon,ble High Court)Hon,ble High Court)High Court)Court)

¶51

AGAINST Orisinat^petition No.506 of 2002 (on the fite of the cmTribunat (principat District Judge) at Natgonda)

¶52

Between:

¶53

The New lndia Assurance Company Ltd.,Represented by its Divisionat Maniger, DivisionaI Office, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad.

¶54

..Appettant/ 2nd Respondent

¶55

AND

¶56

Putta Nagamani, W/o. putta Janaiah, Aged about 25 years, Housewife, R/o..Kukkadam Vittage of Vemutapatti Manda[, Natgonda District.

¶57

Sri Sai Yuvajana Sangham,
Represented by B. Saidi Reddv,.
S/o. Pitchi Reddy, R/o. Kukkjdam Vitijge, "- r>{
.1- ,
Vemutapatti Mandat, Natgonda District. 'r{'
_:,t'- <,iI- ,
Owner of Auto bearing No. Ap_24U-4926.

¶58

...Respondent/ Petitioner

...Respondent/

1st Respondent

P f--)-^-p

I-k

AWARD

This is an appeal fited^{by the Appettant/lnsu rance Company chaltenging the} order dated 24-06-2005^{passed in OP.No.506of 7002by the Chairman, Motor} Accident Ctaims Tribunat^{(PrincipatEistrict Judge), at Natgonda.}

¶67

Smt. A.Gayathri, Manager^{The Authorizedrepresentative of} AppeLl.ant/ lnsu rance Company,^{has appearedand representedthat the} lnsurance Company^{decidednot to pursue the presentappeatand therefore} they are withdrawing the^aPPeat.

¶68

The said representation^{is recordedand the appeatis dismissedas withdrpwn,} confirming the^{judgment and decreeof the Court/TribunalOetow:r{FF} amount, if any, remaining^{unpaid to the ctaimant(s) shatt be deposited'6fl.it.h!} lnsurance Company within one^{month from the date of receipt of the award,} along with interest.

¶69

On such deposit, the^{Respondent/Ctaimant(s)is/are permitted to withdraw} his/her/their respective^{amount/sas per the award passedby the} Tribunat/lvlACT.

¶70

ln case, the^{parties subsequenttycome to know about fiting of cross} appeat/cross objection, they^{are given [iberty to seek recatl of this} Order/Award.

¶71

Court fee^paid on this^{appea[ shatl be refunded.}

¶72

No costs.

¶73

Ril fd 4iftar ''si'ft-{ +q-fifrfin:
'0, liie il"irinoi. it5^5tr1216s Qo' l td'
ft.u0u-
ftftrd tnfr srfir*-dl /eftffftI
or ruYdousrrrureD ATToRNEY
Appettant/Znd ResPondent
lnsurance Com an

¶74

'J499. t-r-"4.-w
CHAIRMAN MEMBER M BER
of the
o
t-
I

The New India Assurance Company Limited, Hyderabad. v. Putta Nagamani and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The New India Assurance Company Limited, Hyderabad. v. Putta Nagamani and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ws. Rsr Infra-Gsrcc (Jv) Vs Sri Arun Kumar Jain, And 3 Others

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs Madhu Latha and 6 Others

The New India Assurance Company Limited Vs Bangaroju Somaiah Chary and 2 Ors.

The New India Assurance Company Limited Vs Pulgam Chandrakala

T. Ravinder Vs Anil Kumar and Another

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs I.v.Ranga Rao and Another