Dismissed

The New India Assurance Company Limited v. Pulgam Chandrakala

Telangana HC23 Jan 2024MACMA/416/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana disposed of an appeal filed by an insurance company challenging a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal order. The matter had been referred to Lok Adalat, where the appellant agreed to withdraw the appeal; consequently, the High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; judgment and decree of the Tribunal confirmed; amount to be deposited with interest.

The New India Assurance Company Limited Vs Pulgam… — Motor Accident Claims | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

t^{321s I}

¶3

IN THE HIGH^{COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶4

TUESDAY,^{THE TWENTYTHIRDDAY OF JANUARY} '"-" TWO iHbUSNT.TO AND TWENry FOUR

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

. THE HONOURABLE DR^{JUSTICE G.RAOHA RANI}

¶7

MOTOR

¶8

60F 2012 ACCIDE^{NT Clvl L MISCELLAN EOUSAPPEALNO:41}

¶9

Appealfiled^{Under.s:ction173of Mo-to^r^V9n'"'"?#1,3n3i",'tlJ'3ilf"Jtiil:} a."r""^iH6h'.'iiJ^{sro ;r zoo3 d't"d 25 0e 2007 on} chairman^{Motor Acciden, "6liit"i"n-,in"t-"rr- IAdditional District Judge'} Khammam

¶10

Between:

¶11

The New^{rndia AssurancecompanyLimited, representedbv its Divisional Manager} o/o.D.No^{30-15-s64,oao; i;;;L;'} Nt;r saraswathi^{Park'Visakhapatnam} District. ...Respondent^{No.2/Appellant}

¶12

...Respondent^{No.2/Appellant}

¶13

¶14

1. Pulgam^{Chandrakala,Wolate p'"'t fu"t@ Ramaiah @ Bakkaiah Occ:} Household^{and Tarloring Work R/oPathariapaduVillage'Chinthakani} Mandal. Khammam^{District Now R/o H No'9' RotaryNagar' Khamman Town} and District

¶15

"'claim^{Petitioner/Respondent}

¶16

E.^{Appala Narasatah'S/o Yellaiah' Owner of Auto Bearing No' AP 31 W 3886} R/oThangarap,u't''""'"vrir's;"^{Bhimli' BheemunipatnamMandal'}

¶17

,^{yl'.1i::1tf[o'riX'",1,ra"rahowner} 9!,Auto^{BearinsNo'AP 31 /Y T86} R/o.Thangarap'u"r"t"'-ilir'r'g"'^{Bhimli' BheemrinipatnamMandal'} Visakhapatnam^District ...Respondent^{Nos.1& 3/Respondents}

¶18

...Respondent^{Nos.1& 3/Respondents}

¶19

I,A. N^{O:2OF2008(MACMAMP.NO:30530F 2008)}

¶20

petition under sectron^{.r51 cpc prayingthat in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit^{filedin support""r'it"iltiiJtlinJHign,co"tmavbe pleasedto Stav} att further^proceedrngs '"t]'i'n]g'-;*l;'tion^{oitht order'andDecreedated} 25-09'2007^{passed in oP N:U0'"ii;6i'"" tn" file of the Motor Accident Claims} Tribunal^{(l Additionalolsir.rci-i'agtl at Khammam'pending disposal of the} MACMA^{before this Court}

¶21

¶22

I I ! I

¶23

l.A. NO: 1OF 2012^{(MACMAMP.NO:429 oF 20121}

¶24

Between

¶25

pulgam chandrakala, wo.late Prem Kumar @ Ramaiah @^{Bakkaiah occ:} Horisehold and Tailoring^{Work R/o.Pathariapadu Village,ChinthakaniMandal,} KhammamDistrict.NowR/o'H,No.g,RotaryNagar,KhammanTownandDistrict.

¶26

...Petitioner/ResPondent^No'1

¶27

¶28

The New^{lndia AssuranceComPanyLimited, rePresentedby ks Divisional} Mansgcr O/o.D.No.30-15-36/A,^{De-baGardens'Near Saraswathi Park'} visakhaPatnam District-

¶29

...RespondenuPetitioner

¶30

E. Appala Narasaiah,^{S/o.Yellaiah, Owner of Auto Bearing No AP 3l W 3S36} Rlo.iirangarapuvalasa^{Village,Bhlmli' BheemunipatnamMandal'} VisakhaPatnam District.

¶31

3.E.Shiva,S/o.AppalaNarasaiahOwnerofAutoBearingNoAP31W3886 R/o.Thangarapuvalasa^{Village' Bhimli, BheemunipatnamMandal'} VisakhaPatnam^District.

¶32

(2nd and 3d Respondent^{are not necessary parties in this Petition)}

¶33

... ResPondents/ResPondents

¶34

Petltlon under Sectlon^{151 CPC} Praying^{that in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed^{in suPport of the} Petition,^{the High Court may be pleasedthe} petitioner/ ResPondent no.1 to withdiaw^{the amount dePositedbefore the Tribunal} below by the^{1"t respondent/ Appellant insurance company}

¶35

Counsel for the^APPellant : Sri IMAAMU^VANI

¶36

: STi NAGESWARA^RAOREPAKULA Counsel for the ResPondent^No.1

¶37

The Court delivered^{the following}

¶38

: JUDGMENT

¶39

THE HONOURABLE^{DR.JUSTTCEG'RADHA RANI}

¶40

M.A.^{C.M.A.No.4 16 of 2012}

¶41

JUDGMENT:

¶42

This appeal^{is filed by the appellant -- lnsulance Companyaggrieved} by the^{order and decree datedl5'09 2007 passed in O'P'No'920 of 2003 by} the Chairman,^{MotorAccidents CllairnsTribunat cum I Additional District}

¶43

Judge,^Khammam

¶44

On^{01 . I 2 2023 the mattcrwas rct'erred to Lok Adalat pursuantto} the letter^{dated 09'll'1021addrcsscdby the Secretary'High Court Legal} Services^{Cotnrnittce'll"dcr-rrhadAn au'ard waspassedby the Lok Adalat} on 30.12'2023^{anil as per thc seid avuard' the leamed counselfor the} appellant^{agreed to rvithdiau'thcappcal'}

¶45

Hence.^{thc appeal i: Jrsposccl ol'internrs of the Award dated}

¶46

30.12.202]^{passetlb1 the [.oL '\clalaL' No ordcr as to costs'}

¶47

Miscellaueotrs^{applications penciing' il- any' shallstand closed'}

¶48

SD/. P.CH.^NAGABHUSHAM ASSISTANT^REGISTR R

¶49

I/TRUE^COPY"

¶50

SECTION^OFFICER

¶51

To, 1. The^{Chairman Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-| AdditionalDistrict} , i'.tj8J,:'3[,'Iro,o,'^{vANrAdvocateto?Ycl.} 3. one CC^{to SRl. *o"==tio-*i"irnon-epnku La AdvocatetoPUcI} o oF LoK^{AoaLAT AwaRDoarEo 30 '12'2023)} lX.to9"%"*lit"^o, "o"t Sp/St, SX,

HIGH COURT

DATED:2310112024

JUDGMENT

MACMA-No.416 ot 2012

1Yt E STA Iei
a.
c.J $ 4 llnt zmq ('7.

o€spatcrr.,-9

¶57

DISPOSING THE MACMA IN TERMS OF AWARD PASSED BY LOK ADALAT

¶58

.:z-.:'

¶59

I r
I

¶60

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA,^HYDERABAD. [Under^{Section I9 ol the Legol Services AulhoritiesAct, l?87 (CenlrolAct)l}

¶61

Date:30-12-2023

¶62

Present: 1.^{Hon'ble JusticeSri J.SreenivasRao,}

¶63

(ludge High court for the State of Telangana) Chairman

¶64

s
--l
tm
@
lhe Slate ot

¶65

Sri N.Parameswar Reddy, Advocate, Member

¶66

Sri Srinivasa Srikanth, Advocate Member

¶67

lYtAClrlA.No.4l 6 of 2012

¶68

(Before the Hon'ble High Court)

¶69

AGAINST

¶70

M.V.O.P.No.920 of 2003

¶71

(On the fite of the Motor Accidents Ctaims^{Tribunal (l Additionat DistrictJudge,} Khammam)

¶72

Bdtween:

¶73

The New lndia Assurance Company^Limited, rep. by its Divisional Manager, Door No.30-15-36/A, Daba Gardens, Near Saraswathi Park, Visakhapatnam District.

¶74

... Respondent No.2/Appettant

¶75

AND

¶76

Putgam Chandrakata W/o Late Prem^Kumar @^Ramaiah @ Bakkaiah,^{aged 22 years, Occ:Househotd and TaitoringWork,} R/o Patfrariapadu Viltage, Chinthakani^Mandat, Khammam District,^{presently residingat H.No.9,} Rotary Nagar, Khammam Town and District.

¶77

---Ctaim Petitioner/ Respondent

¶78

E.Appata Narasaih, S/o Yettaiah,^{Adult, Ownerof Auto} Bearing No.AP-31 W 3886, R/o.Thagarapuvatusa^Viltage, Bhimli Manda[, Bheemunipatnam Mandat,Vizag^District.

¶79

E.Shiva S/o Appata Narasaiah Aged 35 yeais, Owner of Auto bearing^{No.' '} AP-31-W-3886, R/o Thagarapuvatusa Vittage, Bhimli Manda[, Bheemunipatnam Manda[, Vizag District, (Added as^per order, in lA.No.'l73312006 dated.31^{-01 -2007)}

¶80

...Respondents Nol & 3/ Respondents

¶81

AWARD

¶82

This is an appeat fited by the Appettant/lnsurance^{Company chatlengingthe order} dated 25-08-2007^{passed in MVOP.No.920of 2003 by theI Additionat DistrictJudge,} Khammam.

P.r*-a.t ^?-a+

,lr^^'

\ '!

smt.^{A.Gayathri,Manager - The Authorized representativeof APPettant/ lnsurancX} Company,^{hasappearedand rePresentedthat the Insurance Companydecidednot tO} pursue the^{present appeal and therefore they arewithdrawing theappeat'}

¶87

¶88

The said^{representationis recorded and the appeat is dismissedas withdrawn'} confirming^the iudgment^{and decree of the Court/Tribunalbelow Theamount' if} any, remaining^{unPaidto the ctaimant(s) shatt be deposited by the lnsurance} Company within^{one month from the dateof receipt of the award'atong with} interest.

¶89

On such^{deposit, the Respondent/Ctaimant(s)is/are permitted.to} ,YlYl* his/her/theirrespectiveamount/saspertheawardpassedbytheTribunat/MACT.

¶90

ln case,^{the partiessubsequentty cometo knowabout fiting of crossappeat/crosi} objection,^{theyare given tiberty to seek recat[of this order/Award'}

¶91

Court fee^{paid on this aPpeat shattbe refunded'}

¶92

¶93

No costs.

¶94

dftqE{qft+u:ftftft}3
:orThe New lndiaAssurance Co.. Lld
@4-
ftEr+a .nfot qrftr ircftftFr
,)tJLY CONST!TU;ED ATTORNEY
Appettant/ResPondent No'2
lnsurance Com an
,J@.
M R
CHAIRMAN
rcEs
( of the )
st
t
q<br>lh. Sta\e

The New India Assurance Company Limited v. Pulgam Chandrakala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The New India Assurance Company Limited v. Pulgam Chandrakala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ws. Rsr Infra-Gsrcc (Jv) Vs Sri Arun Kumar Jain, And 3 Others

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs Madhu Latha and 6 Others

The New India Assurance Company Limited Vs Bangaroju Somaiah Chary and 2 Ors.

The New India Assurance Company Limited, Hyderabad. Vs Putta Nagamani and Another

T. Ravinder Vs Anil Kumar and Another

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs I.v.Ranga Rao and Another