Disposed

New India Assurance Co.,Ltd v. Alisha Siddiqui and 10 Others

Telangana HC25 Jan 2024MACMA/3875/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of the appeal by the insurance company in terms of a Lok Adalat award dated 30.12.2023, wherein the appellant agreed to withdraw the appeal. The judgment and decree of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal were confirmed.

What did the court decide?

Appeal disposed of in terms of Lok Adalat Award dated 30.12.2023; judgment and decree of Tribunal confirmed.

New India Assurance Co.,Ltd Vs Alisha Siddiqui and… — Motor Accident Claims | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

[^32{51

¶3

IN THE HIGH^{COURTFOR THESTATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAO

¶4

THURSDAY,^{THE TWENW FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY} TWO THOUSAND^{ANDTWENTYFOUR}

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE^{DR. JUST]CE G.RADHA RANI}

¶7

MO R cclD IL M]SCELLANEo S APP O:3 7s oF²⁰¹¹

¶8

Appeal Section^{173 of Motor Vehicle Act againstthe Judgmentand} Decreedatedog-o9.20o2maoeino.P.No.627ot1997onthefileoftheCourt ;f til; M;t";^{A.cidentsClaimi Tribunal-cum-District Judge at Nizamabad'}

¶9

Between:

¶10

New lndia Assurance^{Co. Ltd,rep' by its Divisional Manager'Divisional office} ' ijpi 2.p.omce; Subashnagar, Nizamabad'

¶11

...APPELLANT'^{OPP' Pafi No'2}

¶12

AND

¶13

l.AishaSiddiqui,Wo.Mohimmith,Household'Rl/o'Nirmal'AdilabadDistrict'

¶14

Asha Begum,^{Wo.Shaiklmam Household r/o Nirmal' Adilabad District'}

¶15

Shagufta,^{D/o.MohimmithStudentr/o'Nirmal' Adilabad District'}

¶16

Tabasum,^{D/o.Mohimmith student r/o'Nirmal' Adilabad District'}

¶17

Samrin,^{D/o.Mohimmith student r/o'Nirmal' AdilabadDiskict'}

¶18

Heena,^{D/o.Mohimmith student r/o Nirmal'Adilabad District'}

¶19

Fisal, S/o.Mohimith^{studentr/o Nirmal,Adilabad District'}

¶20

Junedh, S/o.^{Mohimith student r/o'Nirmal' Adilabad District'}

¶21

(Petitioners 3 to 8 are^{minors and are under the guardianship-of their} ii"iri"i mo$"r^{Aisha Siddiqui Wo'Mohimmith' PetitionerNo'1)}

¶22

...ResPondents/Petitioners

¶23

Shaik Muqtar^{Ahamed, s/o' sk Hydel ownerof the ieep No'AP-'l-c-1 742'rlo'2-}

¶24

3-37,Shaikshapet,^{Nirmal,Adilabad Drstrrct'}

¶25

1O.APSRTC,,^{rep. by its General Manager Musheerabad' Hyderabad'}

¶26

11.APSRTC,,^{rep.by its Depot Manager'APSRTC' Mancherial Depot' Adilabad'}

¶27

...Respondents/^{Opp. Parties Nos'1'3 & 4}

¶28

l.A. NO: 1OF 2011^(MACMAMP. NO: 5856 OF 2011)

¶29

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay the execution of decree and^judgment passed in O.P. No.627l'1997 dated 09.09.2002 by the^. Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal cum District Judge, qt Nizamabad, pending the final disposal of the MACMA.

¶30

Counsel for the Appellant : Sri KOTA SUBBA RAO

¶31

Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: Sri P. RADHIVE REDDY

¶32

Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 9 to 1'l : None appeared

¶33

The Court delivered the following: JUOGMENT

¶34

THE HONOURABLE^{DR.JUSTICEG.RADHARANI}

¶35

M.A.C.M..4.^{.No.3875of 201 I}

¶36

JU DGMENT:

¶37

This appeal^{is filed by the appeltant- InsuranceCompany aggrieved} by the^{judgment and decreedated 09'09'2002 passed in O'P'No'627of} 1997 by the^{Chairman, Motor Accident Clairnsl-ribunalcum District} Judge, Nizamabad.

¶38

The matter^{was referred to Lok Adalatput suant to the letter} dared 29.12.2023^{addressedby the Secretary' ttigh CiourtLegal Services} Cornmittee,^{Hyderabad. An award waspassed by the Lok Adalat on} 30.12.2023 and^{as per the said award, the lcarnedcounsellor the appellant} agreed to^{withdrawthe aPPeal.}

¶39

Hence,^{the appealis disposedol- in tcrr-ns ol the Award dated}

¶40

10.12.2023^{passedby the Lok AdalatNo ordcr rts to c()sts'}

¶41

Miscellaneous^{applicationspending' ilany' shallstandclosed'}

¶42

Sd/.P.CH.NAGABHUSHAMBA ASSISTANT^REGISTRAR

//TRUE^COPY'/

SECTION OFFICER

To,

The Motor^{Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-DistrictJudge at Nizamabad} (with records)

//.

One CC to Sri KOTA SUBBA RAO, Advocate tOpUCl 3. One CC to Sri p. RADHTVE REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies

¶51

@nclose^the copy of the Lok Adalat Award dL3 0_12_2023) \k

USR

HIGH COURT

DATED:2 StO1t2O24

JUDGMENT

MACMA.No.3875 of 2011

¶60

E STAt{- oA
t
iq
d 1E APfl 202{

cO
Dr c.. PATC\1

¶61

DISPOSING THE MACMA IN TERMS OF LOK ADALAT AWARD DT.3O/ 1212023

¶62

N^ua >+

¶63

¶64

I
[Under
5e BViC6s
a
f
tn
o I
s$
r$
.:
,,ie StdG

¶65

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT

¶66

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMAAITTEE FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD.

¶67

[Under^{Seclion l9 of lhe} legol Services Aulhorilies Act, 1987 (Cenkol Act)t

¶68

Date:30-12-2023

¶69

Present: 1. Hon'ble Justice Sri J.Sreenivas Rao,

¶70

(ludge Hlgh Court for the State of Telangana) Chairman

¶71

Sri N.Parameswar Reddy, Advocate, Member

¶72

Sri Srinivasa Srikanth, Advocate, Member

¶73

lrlAClv{A. No. 387 5 of 201 1

¶74

(Before the Hon'ble High Court)

¶75

AGAINST

¶76

O.P. No.627 of 1997

¶77

(On the fite of the /vlotor Accident Ctaims Tribunat

¶78

(District Judge) :: At Nizamabad)

¶79

Between:

¶80

The New lndia Assurance Co. Ltd., rep. by its Divit. Manager, Divit. Office, Opp: Z. P.Office, Subashnagar, Nizamabad.

¶81

....Appettant/Opp. Party No.2

¶82

AND

¶83

Atisha Siddiqui, 5/o. Mohimmith, aged: 36 years, Occ: Household, R/o. Nirmal, Dist. Aditabad.

¶84

Asha Begum, W/o. Shaik lmam, 56 years, Occ: House Hold, R/o. Nirmat, Dist. Adilabad.

¶85

Shagufta, D/o.Mohimmith, 14 years, Occ:Student, R/o. Nirmat, Dist. Aditabad..

¶86

Tabasum, D/o. Mohimmith, aged 8 yrs, Occ:Student, R/o. Nirmat, Dist. Aditabad.

¶87

Samrin D/o. Mohimmith, aged 6 yrs, Occ: Student, R/o. Nirmat, Dist. AdiLabad.

¶88

Heena D/o. Mohimmith, aged 5 yrs, Occ: Student, R/o. Nirmat, Dist. Aditabad.

¶89

Fisal S/o. Mohimith, aged 5 yrs, Occ: Student, R/o. Nirmal, Dist. Aditabad.

l-1b,"'-'t-r^F4

)o/(

l \

Junedh^{S/o Mohimmith,3 yrs, Occ: Student'} R/o. Nirmat,^{Dist. Aditabad'}

¶94

(Petitioners -;#;;i;;;i;in"iNo.3 to 8 are^{minors and are under the. guardianshipof} ai'r'u siddiqui^{w/o' Mohimmith'P'1)} ...ResPondents/^Petitioners

¶95

Shaik^{Muqtar Ahamed s/o'Sk'} Hvder,⁴⁰ Yrs,^{ownerof the} JeeP No.AP-1'0-1742,^R/o'H'No' i-iiZ,-St'uif.tf,apet,^{Nirmat, Aditabad District'}

¶96

A.P.S.R.T.C.^{Corporation,rep' by.} .. Its General^{Manager, Musheerabad'HyderaDao'}

¶97

A.P.S.R.T.C.^{Corporation,rep'by} ''' iii'rj"p"i' lrli"ug"r, aeRtc, Mancheriat Depot' Aditabad' "'^{"'" ''-..-i[ipona"ntt} / opp' Parties No' 1' 3 and 4]

¶98

AWARD

¶99

This^{is an appeatfited by theAppetLant/ lnsurance Company chatlengingthe} orderdated0g-o9.2o02passedinoP.No.627ot1997bytheMotorAccident Ctaims Tribunat^{(DistrictJudge) at Nizamabad'}

¶100

Smt.^{A.Gayathri, ManagerThe Authorized representative of} Appettant/^{lnsu ranceCompany'has appearedand representedthat the} lnsuranceCompanydecidednottopursuethepresentappeatandtherefore they are^{withdrawing the aPPeat'}

¶101

The^{saidrepresentationis recordedand the appeal is dismissedas withdrawn'} confirming^{the judgment and decree of the Court/Tribunalbetow' The} amount,^{if any, remaining unpaid to the claimant(s) shattbe deposited by the} lnsurance^{Companywithinone month from the dateof receipt of the award'} atong with^interest'

¶102

4 On such^{deposit, the Respondent/ Ctaimant(s)is/arepermittedto withdraw} hisi her/their^{respectiveurno,ntl,as per the award passed by the} Tribunat/A"IACT. to know^{about fiting of cross}

¶103

1. ln case,^{the partiessubsequenttycome} tiberty to^{seek recatl of this}

¶104

appeat/cross^{objection' they are given} Order/Award.

¶105

SERV s
oo_e
I
$i$$
I
lhe State o\1

^r.y*--:,*^t-J-l

/t' I

Court^{fee paid on this appeal shatl be refunded'}

¶110

5oAC^{f,** 3g'?{} l, ,

¶111

No costs.

¶112

si E^{q gBqI q{dF{qn Grft}c} =o,^{fn" r',r.i"'rnoi" Assuranceco Ltd} u"ffi,,*,b )ULY CONSTITUTEO^ATTORNEV Appettant/OpP.PartY^No.2 lnsurance^Coman

¶113

5W l.P*--r"-P.fi \nrn
CHAIRMAN MEMBER MEMBER

¶114

SERV4
)
H
t
I
llb State ol

New India Assurance Co.,Ltd v. Alisha Siddiqui and 10 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

New India Assurance Co.,Ltd v. Alisha Siddiqui and 10 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The New India Assurance Company Limited, Vs Burugula Venkateshwar Reddy

The National Insurance Company Ltd., Vs Baba Sharaduddin , Sharfuddin and Another

Chinnala Chandraiah Vs Chinnala Kistaiah

G.Vijaya Kumar , Vijaya Chandra Vs E.Shankar

R Indira Devi Vs G Satyaki

Patancheru Narsimha Vs R.Rachanna